SlimesTier 1

at Fyendal Hobby AMB Store Championship

decks

3 (75.0% of field)

matches (non-mirror)

1 1-0-0

overall winrate

100.0%

ELO-adjusted winrate

57.2% avg ELO +11.6 per match

expected value

60.0% share-weighted (raw)

EV (ELO-adj)

57.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)

Pilot Skill ↑ top

mean ELO 1371 · median 1404 · range 1216–1492 (3 pilots with an ELO rating)

1003 Q1 1150 Q3 1322 1539

67% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).

Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent	Their share	Matches	W-L-D	Raw WR	Shrunk WR	Adj WR	ELO Δ/match
Wind Allies	25.0%	1	1-0-0	100.0%	60.0%	57.2%	+11.6

Decklists · 3 from this event

The 3 public Slimes decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 3 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 3 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Lustrous Slime, Slime Eruption, Twilight Slime. Losers more often ran: Kind Beastcaller, Baby Blue Slime, Entrancing Filigree.

↑ Played more by winners

Lustrous Slime

Winning decks ran 3.7 copies on average, losing decks 3.3.

Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.

Slime Eruption

Winning decks ran 3.7 copies on average, losing decks 3.3.

Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.

Twilight Slime

Winning decks ran 0.7 copies on average, losing decks 0.7.

Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.

↓ Played more by losers

Kind Beastcaller

Losing decks ran 2.3 copies on average, winning decks 0.7.

Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 0.

Baby Blue Slime

Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.3.

Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 0.

Entrancing Filigree

Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.3.

Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.

Hymn of Gaia's Grace

Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.7.

Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.

Show all 19 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 12 held back from the grid above)

Card	Edge	In winner	In loser	Same
Kind Beastcaller	-1.00	0	3	0
Baby Blue Slime	-1.00	0	3	0
Slime's Blessing	+0.67	2	0	0
Nullifying Lantern	+0.67	2	0	0
Gaia's Songbird	+0.67	2	0	1
Tariff Ring	+0.67	2	0	0
Nullifying Mirror	-0.67	0	2	1
Resolute Stand	-0.33	0	1	2
Entrancing Filigree	-0.33	1	2	0
Beastbond Boots	+0.33	1	0	2
Lustrous Slime	+0.33	2	1	0
Hymn of Gaia's Grace	-0.33	1	2	0
Scavenging Raccoon	+0.33	1	0	2
Reprogram	+0.33	1	0	2
Slime Eruption	+0.33	2	1	0
Escape the Wreckage	+0.33	1	0	2
Twilight Slime	+0.33	2	1	0
Viridian Protective Trinket	-0.33	0	1	0
Beastbond Ears	-0.33	0	1	0

JSON: /api/events/14488/archetypes/Slimes