← 大圖書館聯盟 大圖書館聯賽

SlimesTier 1

at 大圖書館聯盟 大圖書館聯賽

decks
4 (50.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
4 3-1-0
overall winrate
75.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
51.0% avg ELO +0.7 per match
expected value
55.6% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
50.4% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1342 · median 1256 · range 1161–1694 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1046 Q1 1144 Q3 1243 1694
50% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Crux Hybrid 12.5% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 51.6% +1.6
Fire Erupting 12.5% 0
Water Astra Cleric 12.5% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 48.7% -2.0
Water Ravishing Mill 12.5% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 51.0% +1.6
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Slimes decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 5 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 5 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Blissful Calling, Slimeshield, Bestial Frenzy. Losers more often ran: Baby Red Slime, Tera Sight, Reprogram.

Played more by winners
Blissful Calling
Winning decks ran 3.8 copies on average, losing decks 3.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Slimeshield
Winning decks ran 3.8 copies on average, losing decks 3.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Bestial Frenzy
Winning decks ran 2.8 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Ethereal Slime
Winning decks ran 3.8 copies on average, losing decks 3.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Vampiric Slime
Winning decks ran 1.6 copies on average, losing decks 1.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Engineered Slime
Winning decks ran 3.4 copies on average, losing decks 2.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Played more by losers
Baby Red Slime
Losing decks ran 2.8 copies on average, winning decks 1.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Tera Sight
Losing decks ran 0.8 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Reprogram
Losing decks ran 2.4 copies on average, winning decks 1.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Resolute Stand
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Blanche, Sheltering Saint
Losing decks ran 1.6 copies on average, winning decks 1.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Limitless Slime
Losing decks ran 3.8 copies on average, winning decks 3.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Show all 35 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 15 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Baby Red Slime -0.60 1 4 0
Blissful Calling +0.40 3 1 1
Slimeshield +0.40 3 1 1
Bestial Frenzy +0.40 3 1 1
Tera Sight -0.40 1 3 0
Reprogram -0.40 1 3 1
Ethereal Slime +0.20 2 1 2
Resolute Stand -0.20 1 2 0
Vampiric Slime +0.20 2 1 2
Beastbond Paws -0.20 0 1 0
Grand Crusader's Ring -0.20 0 1 0
Engineered Slime +0.20 2 1 2
Blanche, Sheltering Saint -0.20 1 2 2
Limitless Slime -0.20 1 2 2
Nullifying Lantern +0.20 2 1 0
Baby Blue Slime -0.20 2 3 0
Hymn of Gaia's Grace -0.20 0 1 0
Scavenging Raccoon -0.20 0 1 0
Seeking Shot +0.20 2 1 0
Slime Eruption -0.20 2 3 0
Quicksilver Grail +0.20 1 0 4
Red Slime -0.20 0 1 0
Verdant Slime -0.20 0 1 0
Escape the Wreckage +0.20 2 1 2
Twilight Slime +0.20 2 1 0
Beastbond Ears +0.20 2 1 2
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.20 2 1 0
Slime's Blessing -0.20 1 2 0
Tariff Ring -0.20 1 2 0
Lustrous Slime +0.00 2 2 1
Gaia's Songbird +0.00 2 2 0
Turbo Charge +0.00 1 1 1
Ordinary Bear +0.00 1 1 2
Slime King +0.00 2 2 0
Mechanical Hare +0.00 1 1 2

JSON: /api/events/8942/archetypes/Slimes