← Yeti Gaming Webcam Weekly 2/6/2025

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at Yeti Gaming Webcam Weekly 2/6/2025

decks
4 (8.2% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
12 8-3-1
overall winrate
70.8%
ELO-adjusted winrate
50.9% avg ELO +0.4 per match
expected value
54.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
50.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1416 · median 1357 · range 1200–1750 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1039 Q1 1197 Q3 1413 1750
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Shadowstrike 10.2% 0
Fire Exia 8.2% 0
Slimes 8.2% 0
Water Crux Mage 8.2% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 50.0% +0.0
Water Penguin Mill 8.2% 0
Fire Crux Mage 6.1% 0
Wind Allies 6.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 49.5% -0.8
Fire Crux Lorraine 4.1% 0
Water Allies 4.1% 0
Water Silvie 4.1% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 4.1% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 52.4% +1.8
Wind Razorgale 4.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.5% +0.8
Fire Aggro 2.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 48.9% -1.8
Fire Arcane 2.0% 0
Fire Neos 2.0% 0
Fire Slimes 2.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 49.3% -1.1
Fire Umbra Ranger 2.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.8% +1.3
Water Arcane 2.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.0% +0.0
Water Tera Mage 2.0% 0
Wind Diana 2.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.5% +0.9
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Water Ravishing Mill decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 14 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 14 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Frostbind +1.00 2 0 0
Frozen Dismissal +1.00 2 0 0
Snow Fairy -1.00 0 2 0
Strategem of Myriad Ice +1.00 2 0 0
Rippleback Terrapin -0.50 0 1 1
Tariff Ring -0.50 0 1 1
Nullifying Mirror +0.50 1 0 1
Tidal Lock +0.50 1 0 1
Water Resonance Bauble -0.50 0 1 0
Hailstorm Guard -0.50 0 1 0
Incapacitate -0.50 0 1 0
Temptation's Facade +0.00 1 1 0
Freezing Steel +0.00 1 1 0
Safeguard Amulet +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/18675/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill