← 2024/11/17 GtCG AMB Season Store Championship

SlimesTier 1

at 2024/11/17 GtCG AMB Season Store Championship

decks
6 (28.6% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
23 12-6-5
overall winrate
63.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
57.8% avg ELO +2.9 per match
expected value
54.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
53.3% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1381 · median 1350 · range 1140–1694 (6 pilots with an ELO rating)
1090 Q1 1179 Q3 1428 1694
33% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 17% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Crux Mage 9.5% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.2% +0.1
Wind Astra Cleric 9.5% 4 3-1-0 75.0% 62.5% 59.8% +6.3
Fire Aggro 4.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.6% +7.3
Fire Astra Cleric 4.8% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 4.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.1% +9.8
Fire Slimes 4.8% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 55.5% +5.3
Fire Umbra Ranger 4.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.8% +9.3
Water Allies 4.8% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 46.1% -3.8
Water Astra Cleric 4.8% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 55.3% +5.1
Water Neos 4.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.7% +18.7
Water Ravishing Mill 4.8% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 45.7% -3.2
Water Tera Mage 4.8% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 52.8% +2.7
Wind Neos 4.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.1% -12.6
Decklists · 6 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 6 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 6 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Bestial Frenzy, Orb of Sealing, Mechanical Hare. Losers more often ran: Lustrous Slime, Beastbond Ears, Blanche, Sheltering Saint.

Played more by winners
Bestial Frenzy
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Orb of Sealing
Winning decks ran 0.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Mechanical Hare
Winning decks ran 1.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Gaia's Songbird
Winning decks ran 2.8 copies on average, losing decks 1.8.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Escape the Wreckage
Winning decks ran 3.2 copies on average, losing decks 2.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 2.7 copies on average, losing decks 2.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Played more by losers
Lustrous Slime
Losing decks ran 4.0 copies on average, winning decks 3.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Beastbond Ears
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.3.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Blanche, Sheltering Saint
Losing decks ran 0.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Scavenging Raccoon
Losing decks ran 1.3 copies on average, winning decks 0.7.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Reprogram
Losing decks ran 1.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Blissful Calling
Losing decks ran 2.7 copies on average, winning decks 3.3.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 36 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 16 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Lustrous Slime -0.67 0 4 2
Bestial Frenzy +0.67 4 0 1
Beastbond Ears -0.67 0 4 2
Orb of Sealing +0.50 3 0 0
Mechanical Hare +0.50 3 0 0
Blanche, Sheltering Saint -0.33 1 3 0
Scavenging Raccoon -0.33 1 3 1
Gaia's Songbird +0.33 3 1 2
Reprogram -0.33 1 3 0
Escape the Wreckage +0.33 3 1 2
Engineered Slime -0.33 0 2 0
Green Slime -0.33 0 2 0
Baby Blue Slime -0.33 0 2 0
Verdant Slime -0.33 0 2 0
Resolute Stand +0.17 2 1 3
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.17 3 2 1
Blissful Calling -0.17 2 3 1
Slimeshield -0.17 0 1 5
Spellshield: Tera +0.17 3 2 0
Hymn of Gaia's Grace -0.17 2 3 0
Tera Sight +0.17 3 2 0
Twilight Slime -0.17 2 3 1
Slime King -0.17 0 1 1
Turbo Charge -0.17 1 2 1
Ordinary Bear +0.17 2 1 0
Avatar of Gaia +0.17 1 0 0
Meadowbloom Dryad +0.17 1 0 0
Nullifying Lantern +0.17 1 0 0
Bedivere, Woodland Overseer +0.17 1 0 0
Red Slime +0.17 1 0 0
Slime's Blessing +0.00 3 3 0
Limitless Slime +0.00 1 1 4
Slime Eruption +0.00 1 1 4
Verdant Scepter +0.00 1 1 4
Heavenly Guide +0.00 1 1 0
Seeking Shot +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/13623/archetypes/Slimes