Head-to-head matrix

Each row is a deck; each column is its opponent. Cells show the row deck's shrunk winrate vs the column deck, with raw match counts beneath. Showing archetypes with at least 3 decks in the field. Mirrors (diagonal) are excluded by design.

row vs col →	Fire Exia10.3%	Slimes10.3%	Fire Aggro6.9%	Fire Luxem Assassin6.9%	Wind Allies6.9%	Wind Shadowstrike6.9%	Water Allies5.2%	Water Crux Mage5.2%	Water Penguin Mill5.2%	Water Ravishing Mill5.2%	Wind Razorgale5.2%
Fire Exia 6 decks · 10.3%	—	56% 5	40% 1	·	50% 2	40% 1	50% 2	60% 1	29% 3	·	50% 2
Slimes 6 decks · 10.3%	44% 5	—	40% 1	·	40% 1	42% 2	40% 1	·	40% 1	·	57% 3
Fire Aggro 4 decks · 6.9%	60% 1	60% 1	—	40% 1	60% 1	60% 1	50% 2	·	·	·	60% 1
Fire Luxem Assassin 4 decks · 6.9%	·	·	60% 1	—	·	43% 3	·	·	67% 2	42% 2	40% 1
Wind Allies 4 decks · 6.9%	50% 2	60% 1	40% 1	·	—	58% 2	·	50% 2	40% 1	·	·
Wind Shadowstrike 4 decks · 6.9%	60% 1	58% 2	40% 1	57% 3	42% 2	—	·	·	·	40% 1	40% 1
Water Allies 3 decks · 5.2%	50% 2	60% 1	50% 2	·	·	·	—	·	·	·	·
Water Crux Mage 3 decks · 5.2%	40% 1	·	·	·	50% 2	·	·	—	60% 1	·	·
Water Penguin Mill 3 decks · 5.2%	71% 3	60% 1	·	33% 2	60% 1	·	·	40% 1	—	·	·
Water Ravishing Mill 3 decks · 5.2%	·	·	·	58% 2	·	60% 1	·	·	·	—	60% 1
Wind Razorgale 3 decks · 5.2%	50% 2	43% 3	40% 1	60% 1	·	60% 1	·	·	·	40% 1	—