← Abyssal Heaven UK Regional!

Water FractalTier 1

at Abyssal Heaven UK Regional!

decks
4 (22.2% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
17 10-4-3
overall winrate
67.6%
ELO-adjusted winrate
61.4% avg ELO +4.5 per match
expected value
55.2% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
53.9% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1301 · median 1297 · range 1282–1327 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1023 Q1 1147 Q3 1283 1420
75% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Firebloom Burn 11.1% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 45.0% -3.8
Wind Astra Cleric 11.1% 6 1-3-2 33.3% 40.0% 49.1% -0.5
Fire Aggro 5.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.9% +15.8
Fire Astra Cleric 5.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.9% +7.8
Fire Crux Mage 5.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.0% +12.8
Fire Exia 5.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.9% +14.3
Fire Kongming 5.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.4% +10.3
Slimes 5.6% 0
Water Tera Mage 5.6% 0
Wind Byakko 5.6% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 58.9% +8.5
Wind Diao Chan 5.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 57.8% +12.5
Wind Umbra Diana 5.6% 0
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Water Fractal decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 5 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 5 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Fire Resonance Bauble, Staggering Strike, Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa. Losers more often ran: Extricating Touch, Jianyu, Fate's Premonition, Unstable Fractal.

Played more by winners
Fire Resonance Bauble
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Staggering Strike
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa
Winning decks ran 1.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Disenchant
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Played more by losers
Extricating Touch
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Jianyu, Fate's Premonition
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 0.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Unstable Fractal
Losing decks ran 4.0 copies on average, winning decks 3.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Lost in Thought Banned
Lost in Thought
Losing decks ran 4.0 copies on average, winning decks 3.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Wind Resonance Bauble
Losing decks ran 0.8 copies on average, winning decks 0.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Art of War
Losing decks ran 0.6 copies on average, winning decks 0.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Show all 20 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 8 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Fire Resonance Bauble +0.80 4 0 1
Extricating Touch -0.80 0 4 0
Staggering Strike +0.60 3 0 0
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa +0.60 3 0 0
Jianyu, Fate's Premonition -0.60 0 3 2
Unstable Fractal -0.60 0 3 2
Lost in Thought -0.60 0 3 2
Disenchant +0.60 3 0 0
Frostbind -0.40 0 2 0
Zhang Jiao, Way of Peace +0.40 2 0 3
Grand Crusader's Ring -0.40 0 2 0
Coronation Ceremony -0.40 0 2 0
Fractal of Refreshment -0.40 0 2 0
Fractal of Intrusion +0.40 2 0 3
Turbo Charge +0.40 2 0 3
Quicksilver Grail +0.40 2 0 3
Wind Resonance Bauble -0.20 1 2 2
Art of War -0.20 1 2 1
Captivating Opulence -0.20 1 2 1
Chill to the Bone +0.00 2 2 1

JSON: /api/events/22378/archetypes/Water Fractal