← Mystery Store Championship

Wind AlliesTier 1

at Mystery Store Championship

decks
3 (21.4% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
13 9-3-1
overall winrate
73.1%
ELO-adjusted winrate
75.9% avg ELO +10.9 per match
expected value
58.3% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
61.0% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1261 · median 1278 · range 1203–1303 (3 pilots with an ELO rating)
1176 Q1 1284 Q3 1453 1607
0% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 67% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Aggro 14.3% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 62.8% +12.3
Fire Crux Mage 14.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 62.5% +20.1
Fire Luxem Assassin 14.3% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 63.1% +9.8
Fire Slimes 7.1% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 65.2% +11.4
Water Fractal 7.1% 0
Water Neos 7.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.8% -5.2
Water Ravishing Mill 7.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.4% +13.5
Wind Crux Mage 7.1% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 62.8% +12.3
Decklists · 3 from this event

The 3 public Wind Allies decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 3 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 3 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Reclaim, Rose, Eternal Paragon, Bertha, Spry Howitzer. Losers more often ran: Perse, Relentless Raptor, Sword of Seeking, Rallied Advance.

Played more by winners
Reclaim
Winning decks ran 3.7 copies on average, losing decks 3.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Rose, Eternal Paragon
Winning decks ran 2.3 copies on average, losing decks 1.7.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Bertha, Spry Howitzer
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Mortal Ambition
Winning decks ran 1.3 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Tonoris, Lone Mercenary
Winning decks ran 0.7 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Windmill Engineer
Winning decks ran 2.7 copies on average, losing decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Played more by losers
Perse, Relentless Raptor
Losing decks ran 2.3 copies on average, winning decks 2.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Sword of Seeking
Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Rallied Advance
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Guan Yu, Prime Exemplar
Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Second Wind
Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Parcenet, Royal Maid
Losing decks ran 2.3 copies on average, winning decks 2.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Show all 40 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 22 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Reclaim +0.33 2 1 0
Perse, Relentless Raptor -0.33 1 2 0
Rose, Eternal Paragon +0.33 2 1 0
Tithe Proclamation -0.33 0 1 0
Bertha, Spry Howitzer +0.33 2 1 0
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa -0.33 0 1 0
Attune with the Winds -0.33 0 1 0
Eye of Argus +0.33 1 0 2
Zhang Fei, Spirited Steel -0.33 0 1 0
Sword of Seeking -0.33 1 2 0
Rallied Advance -0.33 1 2 0
Mortal Ambition +0.33 2 1 0
Tonoris, Lone Mercenary +0.33 2 1 0
Guan Yu, Prime Exemplar -0.33 1 2 0
Windmill Engineer +0.33 2 1 0
Second Wind -0.33 1 2 0
Parcenet, Royal Maid -0.33 1 2 0
Wind Resonance Bauble +0.33 1 0 2
Ornamental Greatsword -0.33 1 2 0
Favorable Winds -0.33 1 2 0
Backstep +0.33 2 1 0
Bulwark Sword +0.33 2 1 0
Verdigris Decree -0.33 1 2 0
Nullifying Mirror +0.33 1 0 2
Lorraine, Wandering Warrior -0.33 1 2 0
Dilu, Auspicious Charger +0.00 1 1 1
Liu Bei, Oathkeeper +0.00 1 1 1
Stifling Trap +0.00 1 1 1
Nullifying Lantern +0.00 1 1 1
Eternal Magistrate +0.00 1 1 1
Swift Recruit +0.00 1 1 1
Dream Fairy +0.00 1 1 1
Skirting Step +0.00 1 1 1
Shimmercloak Assassin +0.00 1 1 0
Charged Mannequin +0.00 1 1 0
Tempest Downfall +0.00 1 1 0
Deflecting Edge +0.00 1 1 0
Manufacture Cell +0.00 1 1 0
Andronika, Eternal Herald +0.00 1 1 0
Scatter Essence +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/13804/archetypes/Wind Allies