← ArtofCards AMB Store Championship

SlimesTier 1

at ArtofCards AMB Store Championship

decks
9 (25.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
43 22-12-9
overall winrate
61.6%
ELO-adjusted winrate
62.4% avg ELO +4.3 per match
expected value
52.3% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
54.4% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1274 · median 1209 · range 1100–1539 (9 pilots with an ELO rating)
1087 Q1 1184 Q3 1407 1685
22% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 33% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Razorgale 22.2% 16 5-8-3 40.6% 42.5% 50.3% +0.1
Water Ravishing Mill 11.1% 4 2-1-1 62.5% 56.2% 58.3% +5.3
Wind Allies 8.3% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 54.4% +3.3
Fire Crux Mage 5.6% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.9% -11.3
Fire Aggro 2.8% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 64.1% +13.5
Fire Arcane 2.8% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 66.0% +12.0
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.8% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 2.8% 3 2-0-1 83.3% 64.3% 61.5% +8.6
Water Arisanna 2.8% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.8% +1.3
Wind Astra Cleric 2.8% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 61.8% +8.8
Wind Crux Mage 2.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.7% +18.7
Wind Shadowstrike 2.8% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 58.0% +7.7
Wind Tera Mage 2.8% 2 0-0-2 50.0% 50.0% 56.5% +6.2
Wind Umbra Tristan 2.8% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 50.6% +0.6
Decklists · 9 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 4 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 4 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Slime King, Resolute Stand. Losers more often ran: Nullifying Lantern, Slime Eruption.

Played more by winners
Slime King
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Played more by losers
Nullifying Lantern
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Slime Eruption
Losing decks ran 3.8 copies on average, winning decks 3.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 22 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 17 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Slime King +0.75 3 0 0
Nullifying Lantern -0.75 0 3 1
Slimeshield -0.50 0 2 2
Safeguard Amulet +0.50 2 0 0
Escape the Wreckage -0.50 0 2 2
Nullifying Mirror +0.50 2 0 2
Beastbond Ears +0.50 2 0 0
Slime's Blessing -0.50 0 2 1
Hymn of Gaia's Grace -0.50 0 2 1
Resolute Stand +0.25 2 1 1
Kind Beastcaller +0.25 1 0 1
Turbo Charge -0.25 0 1 0
Slime Eruption -0.25 1 2 1
Stonescale Band -0.25 0 1 3
Powercell -0.25 0 1 0
Heavenly Guide +0.25 1 0 0
Reprogram -0.25 0 1 0
Blissful Calling +0.00 1 1 2
Lustrous Slime +0.00 1 1 2
Scavenging Raccoon +0.00 1 1 2
Tera Sight +0.00 2 2 0
Twilight Slime +0.00 1 1 1

JSON: /api/events/15177/archetypes/Slimes