← GAMERSSHOP STORE CHAMPIONSHIP

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at GAMERSSHOP STORE CHAMPIONSHIP

decks
3 (10.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
11 6-3-2
overall winrate
63.6%
ELO-adjusted winrate
45.5% avg ELO -1.9 per match
expected value
52.6% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
47.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1520 · median 1500 · range 1419–1642 (3 pilots with an ELO rating)
1076 Q1 1231 Q3 1462 1642
67% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Penguin Mill 20.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 45.3% -4.5
Fire Crux Mage 13.3% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 34.9% -24.1
Slimes 13.3% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 60.6% +10.2
Fire Aggro 6.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 35.6% -23.1
Fire Exia 6.7% 3 2-0-1 83.3% 64.3% 55.4% +4.0
Wind Allies 6.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.1% +6.6
Wind Razorgale 6.7% 0
Fire Arcane 3.3% 0
Fire Slimes 3.3% 0
Wind Shadowstrike 3.3% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 47.4% -4.2
Wind Silvie 3.3% 0
Wind Umbra Ranger 3.3% 0
Decklists · 3 from this event

The 3 public Water Ravishing Mill decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 5 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 5 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Frozen Dismissal +1.00 2 0 0
Snow Fairy -1.00 0 2 0
Tidal Lock -1.00 0 2 0
Frostbind +0.50 1 0 1
Scavenging Raccoon +0.50 1 0 1

JSON: /api/events/17481/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill