← 7/13 MRC店冠賽 MRC Store Championship

SlimesTier 2

at 7/13 MRC店冠賽 MRC Store Championship

decks
4 (20.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
11 4-4-3
overall winrate
50.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
44.2% avg ELO -2.5 per match
expected value
48.9% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
46.6% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1263 · median 1263 · range 1097–1429 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1097 Q1 1246 Q3 1422 1694
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 50% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Shadowstrike 25.0% 4 1-1-2 50.0% 50.0% 47.0% -1.9
Water Ravishing Mill 15.0% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 51.0% +1.6
Wind Slimes 10.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 35.8% -22.8
Fire Aggro 5.0% 0
Fire Crux Mage 5.0% 0
Fire Lorraine 5.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 43.2% -6.5
Fire Luxem Assassin 5.0% 0
Water Neos 5.0% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 56.3% +4.7
Wind Allies 5.0% 0
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Slimes decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 3 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 3 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Vampiric Slime, Slime King, Bestial Frenzy.

Played more by winners
Vampiric Slime
Winning decks ran 1.7 copies on average, losing decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Slime King
Winning decks ran 3.7 copies on average, losing decks 3.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Bestial Frenzy
Winning decks ran 2.7 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Played more by losers

No cards correlated with losing.

Show all 35 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 32 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Green Slime -0.67 0 2 1
Vampiric Slime +0.33 2 1 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.33 1 0 2
Dungeon Guide +0.33 1 0 2
Engineered Slime +0.33 1 0 1
Slime King +0.33 2 1 0
Beastbond Boots +0.33 1 0 1
Backup Charger +0.33 1 0 1
Bestial Frenzy +0.33 2 1 0
Beastbond Ears +0.33 1 0 1
Key Slime Pudding -0.33 0 1 0
Beastbond Paws -0.33 0 1 0
Blue Slime -0.33 0 1 0
Slime's Blessing +0.33 1 0 0
Reprogram +0.33 1 0 0
Ethereal Slime +0.00 1 1 1
Horn of Beastcalling +0.00 1 1 1
Tithe Proclamation +0.00 1 1 0
Gloamspire Mantle +0.00 1 1 0
Dusklight Communion +0.00 1 1 0
Kraal, Stonescale Tyrant +0.00 1 1 0
Gather Slimes +0.00 1 1 1
Seed of Nature +0.00 1 1 0
Slime Totem +0.00 1 1 0
Limitless Slime +0.00 1 1 1
Lustrous Slime +0.00 1 1 1
Hymn of Gaia's Grace +0.00 1 1 0
Turbo Charge +0.00 1 1 0
Tera Sight +0.00 1 1 1
Morgan, Soul Guide +0.00 1 1 1
Bedivere, Woodland Overseer +0.00 1 1 0
Verdant Slime +0.00 1 1 1
Escape the Wreckage +0.00 1 1 1
Twilight Slime +0.00 1 1 0
Geldus, Terror of Dorumegia +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/6175/archetypes/Slimes