← Aria's Cardshop MRC Regionals (ONLINE)

SlimesTier 1

at Aria's Cardshop MRC Regionals (ONLINE)

decks
10 (20.8% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
46 20-18-8
overall winrate
52.2%
ELO-adjusted winrate
51.1% avg ELO +0.4 per match
expected value
51.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
51.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1354 · median 1372 · range 1200–1477 (10 pilots with an ELO rating)
1107 Q1 1273 Q3 1433 1689
20% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 20% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Aggro 12.5% 8 5-3-0 62.5% 58.3% 53.7% +1.8
Wind Allies 12.5% 8 4-4-0 50.0% 50.0% 54.2% +2.0
Fire Crux Hybrid 8.3% 0
Fire Slimes 6.2% 4 1-2-1 37.5% 43.8% 45.9% -2.6
Water Ravishing Mill 6.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.5% +5.5
Wind Shadowstrike 6.2% 6 2-2-2 50.0% 50.0% 51.0% +0.5
Fire Crux Lorraine 4.2% 5 2-3-0 40.0% 44.4% 46.9% -1.8
Fire Crux Merlin 4.2% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.1% +0.1
Fire Erupting 4.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 45.2% -7.6
Fire Crux Mage 2.1% 3 0-1-2 33.3% 42.9% 44.7% -3.9
Fire Diana 2.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.6% +5.7
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 43.8% -10.0
Fire Neos Tonoris 2.1% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 58.0% +7.7
Water Allies 2.1% 0
Wind Beast 2.1% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 2.1% 3 1-0-2 66.7% 57.1% 52.4% +1.8
Decklists · 10 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 5 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 5 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Gaia's Songbird, Ordinary Bear, Blissful Calling. Losers more often ran: Baby Blue Slime, Reprogram, Verdant Slime.

Played more by winners
Gaia's Songbird
Winning decks ran 3.4 copies on average, losing decks 1.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Ordinary Bear
Winning decks ran 2.8 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Blissful Calling
Winning decks ran 4.0 copies on average, losing decks 3.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Hymn of Gaia's Grace
Winning decks ran 1.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Slime's Blessing
Winning decks ran 0.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 1.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Played more by losers
Baby Blue Slime
Losing decks ran 1.2 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Reprogram
Losing decks ran 3.4 copies on average, winning decks 2.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Verdant Slime
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Slime King
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 1.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Slimeshield
Losing decks ran 3.4 copies on average, winning decks 3.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Tera Sight
Losing decks ran 0.6 copies on average, winning decks 0.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Show all 32 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 16 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Gaia's Songbird +0.80 4 0 1
Ordinary Bear +0.60 3 0 1
Blissful Calling +0.60 3 0 2
Hymn of Gaia's Grace +0.60 3 0 2
Baby Blue Slime -0.60 0 3 0
Reprogram -0.60 1 4 0
Verdant Slime -0.60 0 3 0
Vampiric Slime -0.40 0 2 0
Slime's Blessing +0.40 3 1 0
Fast Cure +0.40 2 0 0
Resolute Stand +0.20 2 1 1
Beastbond Paws -0.20 0 1 0
Dungeon Guide +0.20 1 0 4
Slime King -0.20 1 2 2
Slimeshield -0.20 1 2 2
Beastbond Boots +0.20 1 0 4
Backup Charger +0.20 1 0 4
Nullifying Lantern -0.20 0 1 2
Turbo Charge +0.20 2 1 0
Tera Sight -0.20 1 2 1
Slime Eruption -0.20 2 3 0
Quicksilver Grail +0.20 1 0 4
Gaia's Blessing +0.20 1 0 4
Azure Protective Trinket -0.20 0 1 0
Key Slime Pudding -0.20 0 1 0
Meadowbloom Dryad -0.20 0 1 0
Scavenging Raccoon -0.20 0 1 0
Lustrous Slime +0.00 1 1 3
Bestial Frenzy +0.00 2 2 1
Incapacitate +0.00 1 1 0
Twilight Slime +0.00 2 2 0
Beastbond Ears +0.00 1 1 2

JSON: /api/events/7070/archetypes/Slimes