← Yeti Gaming Webcam Local 8/8/2024

SlimesTier 1

at Yeti Gaming Webcam Local 8/8/2024

decks
8 (14.8% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
25 13-6-6
overall winrate
64.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
51.1% avg ELO +0.4 per match
expected value
54.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
50.4% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1325 · median 1342 · range 1138–1652 (8 pilots with an ELO rating)
1055 Q1 1210 Q3 1366 1652
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 38% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Shadowstrike 16.7% 6 4-1-1 75.0% 65.0% 51.6% +0.8
Wind Allies 14.8% 4 1-1-2 50.0% 50.0% 49.9% -0.1
Fire Crux Mage 9.3% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 49.9% -0.0
Fire Crux Hybrid 7.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 49.4% -1.0
Fire Aggro 5.6% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 51.4% +1.3
Water Ravishing Mill 5.6% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% -0.0
Fire Crux Merlin 3.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 49.1% -1.4
Water Crux Lorraine 3.7% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 50.2% +0.2
Water Neos 3.7% 4 3-1-0 75.0% 62.5% 51.5% +1.0
Fire Arcane 1.9% 0
Fire Crux Lorraine 1.9% 0
Fire Neos 1.9% 0
Fire Slimes 1.9% 0
Fire Zander 1.9% 0
Water Astra Cleric 1.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.8% +1.3
Wind Arcane 1.9% 0
Wind Umbra Ranger 1.9% 0
Decklists · 8 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 25 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 25 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Slime's Blessing -1.00 0 2 0
Lustrous Slime -1.00 0 2 0
Gaia's Songbird +1.00 2 0 0
Twilight Slime +1.00 2 0 0
Baby Blue Slime +1.00 2 0 0
Vampiric Slime +0.50 1 0 0
Slimeshield +0.50 1 0 1
Scavenging Raccoon -0.50 0 1 0
Tera Sight +0.50 1 0 0
Stonescale Band -0.50 0 1 1
Escape the Wreckage +0.50 1 0 1
Blissful Calling -0.50 0 1 1
Engineered Slime -0.50 0 1 0
Slime King -0.50 0 1 1
Beastbond Boots +0.50 1 0 1
Gather Slimes -0.50 0 1 1
Blanche, Sheltering Saint -0.50 0 1 0
Hymn of Gaia's Grace +0.50 1 0 1
Bestial Frenzy -0.50 0 1 0
Mechanical Hare -0.50 0 1 0
Nullifying Lantern +0.50 1 0 0
Fast Cure -0.50 0 1 0
Ordinary Bear +0.00 1 1 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.00 1 1 0
Slime Eruption +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/8917/archetypes/Slimes