← Yeti Gaming Webcam Weekly 8/29

SlimesTier 1

at Yeti Gaming Webcam Weekly 8/29

decks
10 (23.8% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
29 19-6-4
overall winrate
72.4%
ELO-adjusted winrate
51.8% avg ELO +0.7 per match
expected value
60.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
51.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1344 · median 1347 · range 1159–1535 (10 pilots with an ELO rating)
1055 Q1 1207 Q3 1431 1648
20% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 20% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Crux Mage 11.9% 4 3-0-1 87.5% 68.8% 51.8% +1.2
Wind Allies 11.9% 6 4-1-1 75.0% 65.0% 51.8% +1.0
Wind Shadowstrike 7.1% 4 3-1-0 75.0% 62.5% 51.0% +0.6
Fire Arcane 4.8% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 51.0% +0.7
Water Ravishing Mill 4.8% 0
Wind Neos 4.8% 0
Wind Slice & Dice 4.8% 3 2-0-1 83.3% 64.3% 51.3% +0.9
Fire Aggro 2.4% 0
Fire Crux Lorraine 2.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.0% +0.0
Fire Crux Merlin 2.4% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 48.9% -1.1
Fire Erupting 2.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 51.0% +1.5
Fire Lorraine 2.4% 0
Fire Neos 2.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.6% +1.0
Fire Zander 2.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.6% +1.0
Water Allies 2.4% 0
Water Astra Cleric 2.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 51.1% +1.7
Water Luxem Assassin 2.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 49.5% -0.8
Water Neos 2.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 49.4% -0.9
Wind Crux Lorraine 2.4% 0
Wind Crux Mage 2.4% 0
Decklists · 10 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 5 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 5 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Blissful Calling, Escape the Wreckage, Resolute Stand. Losers more often ran: Baby Blue Slime, Beastbond Paws, Gaia's Songbird.

Played more by winners
Blissful Calling
Winning decks ran 3.8 copies on average, losing decks 2.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Escape the Wreckage
Winning decks ran 3.4 copies on average, losing decks 2.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 1.4 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Ordinary Bear
Winning decks ran 1.4 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Beastbond Boots
Winning decks ran 0.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Reprogram
Winning decks ran 3.0 copies on average, losing decks 1.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 0.
Played more by losers
Baby Blue Slime
Losing decks ran 1.4 copies on average, winning decks 0.4.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 2.
Beastbond Paws
Losing decks ran 0.4 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Gaia's Songbird
Losing decks ran 3.0 copies on average, winning decks 2.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 0.
Slime Eruption
Losing decks ran 3.0 copies on average, winning decks 2.6.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 0.
Verdant Slime
Losing decks ran 1.2 copies on average, winning decks 0.8.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 0.
Twilight Slime
Losing decks ran 1.2 copies on average, winning decks 1.2.
Of 5 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Show all 44 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 30 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Blissful Calling +0.60 3 0 2
Baby Blue Slime -0.60 0 3 0
Slime's Blessing -0.40 0 2 1
Escape the Wreckage +0.40 3 1 1
Bestial Frenzy +0.40 2 0 1
Ethereal Slime +0.20 1 0 4
Resolute Stand +0.20 2 1 1
Horn of Beastcalling -0.20 0 1 4
Beastbond Paws -0.20 1 2 0
Water Resonance Bauble +0.20 1 0 0
Fire Resonance Bauble +0.20 1 0 0
Ordinary Bear +0.20 2 1 0
Grand Crusader's Ring +0.20 1 0 0
Slime King +0.20 1 0 4
Slimeshield +0.20 1 0 4
Beastbond Boots +0.20 2 1 2
Limitless Slime +0.20 1 0 4
Song of Nurturing -0.20 0 1 0
Wind Resonance Bauble +0.20 1 0 0
Gaia's Songbird -0.20 2 3 0
Reprogram +0.20 3 2 0
Slime Eruption -0.20 2 3 0
Safeguard Amulet +0.20 1 0 0
Quicksilver Grail -0.20 0 1 4
Verdant Scepter +0.20 1 0 4
Verdant Slime -0.20 2 3 0
Twilight Slime -0.20 1 2 2
Tera Sight -0.20 1 2 1
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.20 1 0 0
Key Slime Pudding -0.20 0 1 0
Vampiric Slime -0.20 0 1 0
Engineered Slime -0.20 0 1 0
Smoke Bombs -0.20 0 1 0
Crimson Protective Trinket -0.20 0 1 0
Backup Charger +0.00 1 1 3
Lustrous Slime +0.00 1 1 3
Nullifying Lantern +0.00 1 1 2
Hymn of Gaia's Grace +0.00 2 2 1
Fast Cure +0.00 1 1 0
Turbo Charge +0.00 1 1 2
Tariff Ring +0.00 1 1 0
Beastbond Ears +0.00 1 1 1
Orb of Regret +0.00 1 1 0
Red Slime +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/9875/archetypes/Slimes