← Mana Pro Store Championship Singapore

Water Ravishing MillTier 2

at Mana Pro Store Championship Singapore

decks
4 (9.1% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
15 6-6-3
overall winrate
50.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
46.7% avg ELO -1.3 per match
expected value
49.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
48.0% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1311 · median 1301 · range 1188–1455 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
953 Q1 1209 Q3 1457 1624
0% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 25% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Penguin Mill 20.5% 3 1-0-2 66.7% 57.1% 55.2% +3.9
Fire Crux Mage 18.2% 6 2-3-1 41.7% 45.0% 41.5% -4.5
Slimes 9.1% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 9.1% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 42.6% -5.5
Fire Exia 6.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% -16.0
Wind Shadowstrike 6.8% 0
Water Allies 4.5% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 60.6% +16.9
Wind Razorgale 4.5% 0
Fire Umbra Diana 2.3% 0
Ravishing Mill 2.3% 0
Water Crux Mage 2.3% 0
Wind Cats 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.9% +11.1
Wind Kongming 2.3% 0
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Water Ravishing Mill decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 16 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 16 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Frostbind -1.00 0 2 0
Mystic Purifier +1.00 2 0 0
Spirit of Serene Water -0.50 0 1 1
Seaside Ringleader +0.50 1 0 1
Glacial Guidance +0.50 1 0 1
Tideholder Claymore +0.50 1 0 0
Tidal Lock +0.50 1 0 1
Water Resonance Bauble -0.50 0 1 0
Snow Fairy -0.50 0 1 0
Song of Frost +0.00 1 1 0
Frozen Dismissal +0.00 1 1 0
Temptation's Facade +0.00 1 1 0
Hailstorm Guard +0.00 1 1 0
Glacial Evocation +0.00 1 1 0
Cerulean Decree +0.00 1 1 0
Incapacitate +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/13567/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill