← 淡水 貓腳印 AMB 店家冠軍賽

Fire AggroTier 2

at 淡水 貓腳印 AMB 店家冠軍賽

decks
3 (10.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
11 4-6-1
overall winrate
40.9%
ELO-adjusted winrate
53.2% avg ELO +1.4 per match
expected value
46.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
52.6% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1301 · median 1257 · range 1160–1486 (3 pilots with an ELO rating)
1088 Q1 1265 Q3 1455 1536
33% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 67% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 23.3% 6 3-2-1 58.3% 55.0% 65.3% +8.2
Water Ravishing Mill 13.3% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 43.4% -10.5
Wind Razorgale 13.3% 0
Fire Crux Mage 10.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 48.0% -1.9
Wind Allies 10.0% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 39.9% -9.7
Fire Astra Cleric 6.7% 0
Wind Shadowstrike 6.7% 0
Fire Arcane 3.3% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 3.3% 0
Decklists · 3 from this event

The 3 public Fire Aggro decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 41 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 41 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Xiao Qiao, Cinderkeeper -1.00 0 2 0
Reduce to Ash +0.50 1 0 1
Sharpen Blade +0.50 1 0 0
Veteran Blazebearer -0.50 0 1 1
Captivating Cutthroat -0.50 0 1 1
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa +0.50 1 0 0
Manic Zealot +0.50 1 0 1
Heated Vengeance -0.50 0 1 1
Rococo, Explosive Maven -0.50 0 1 1
Tristan, Underhanded +0.50 1 0 0
Honorable Vanguard +0.50 1 0 0
Creative Shock +0.50 1 0 0
Blazing Bowman -0.50 0 1 1
Assassin's Ripper +0.50 1 0 0
Cremation Ritual +0.50 1 0 0
Blinding Orb +0.50 1 0 0
Quicksilver Grail +0.50 1 0 0
Sadi, Blood Harvester +0.50 1 0 0
Corhazi Courier +0.50 1 0 1
Innervate Fury +0.50 1 0 0
Rending Flames +0.50 1 0 0
Vicious Slice -0.50 0 1 1
Lurking Assailant -0.50 0 1 0
Relic of Dancing Embers -0.50 0 1 0
Set Ablaze -0.50 0 1 0
Wind Resonance Bauble -0.50 0 1 0
Varuckan Soulknife +0.00 1 1 0
Grand Crusader's Ring +0.00 1 1 0
Mercenary's Blade +0.00 1 1 0
Smoke Bombs +0.00 1 1 0
Backup Charger +0.00 1 1 0
Spark Alight +0.00 1 1 0
Poisoned Coating Oil +0.00 1 1 0
Reprogram +0.00 1 1 0
Immolation Trap +0.00 1 1 0
Clumsy Apprentice +0.00 1 1 0
Tariff Ring +0.00 1 1 0
Nullifying Mirror +0.00 1 1 0
Poisoned Dagger +0.00 1 1 0
Zander, Prepared Scout +0.00 1 1 0
Impact Hammer +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/15239/archetypes/Fire Aggro