← Regionals

Water AlliesTier 1

at Regionals

decks
4 (9.3% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
22 12-8-2
overall winrate
59.1%
ELO-adjusted winrate
40.3% avg ELO -3.7 per match
expected value
55.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
44.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1447 · median 1501 · range 1149–1638 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1051 Q1 1171 Q3 1328 1638
75% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 25% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Rile 41.9% 9 5-3-1 61.1% 57.7% 41.3% -4.0
Wind Shadowstrike 11.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 51.5% +2.4
Fire Umbra Guardian 9.3% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 42.9% -6.8
Fire Aggro 4.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 33.6% -26.3
Fire Crux Mage 4.7% 0
Fire Suzaku 4.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.7% +10.7
Water Genbu 4.7% 0
Wind Allies 4.7% 0
Fire Firebloom Burn 2.3% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.3% 0
Fire Oblation 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.8% +4.4
Fire Suited 2.3% 0
Fire Umbra Diana 2.3% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 2.3% 0
Water Aetherwing 2.3% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.5% -16.7
Water Crux Mage 2.3% 0
Water Fractal 2.3% 0
Water Oblation 2.3% 0
Water Penguin Mill 2.3% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 54.5% +4.3
Water Rile 2.3% 0
Water Tera Cleric 2.3% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 48.4% -1.5
Water Umbra Guardian 2.3% 0
Wind Lorraine 2.3% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 44.1% -5.7
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Water Allies decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 26 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 26 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Frostbind -1.00 0 2 0
Expose Darkness -1.00 0 2 0
Staggering Strike -1.00 0 2 0
Snow White, Weiss Queen -1.00 0 2 0
Nia, Mistveiled Scout -1.00 0 2 0
Xuchang, Frozen Citadel +1.00 2 0 0
Deflecting Edge +1.00 2 0 0
Throne-Keeper Bullfrog +1.00 2 0 0
Seasprite Diver -1.00 0 2 0
Inspiring Call -1.00 0 2 0
Freezing Hail +1.00 2 0 0
Lunete, Frostbinder Priest +1.00 2 0 0
Inundating Clash +1.00 2 0 0
Jueying, Shadowmare -1.00 0 2 0
Song of Frost -0.50 0 1 1
Esteemed Knight -0.50 0 1 1
Water Resonance Bauble +0.50 1 0 0
Fire Resonance Bauble +0.50 1 0 0
Snow Fairy -0.50 0 1 1
Portentous Tanggu +0.50 1 0 0
Fracturize -0.50 0 1 1
Mandate of Honor -0.50 0 1 1
Nullifying Lantern -0.50 0 1 1
Xia Hou Dun, Gloryseeker +0.50 1 0 0
Sadi, Blood Harvester +0.50 1 0 0
Automated Gardener +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/32160/archetypes/Water Allies