← Card Merchant Hamilton Regionals (DTR)

Fire Firebloom BurnTier 1

at Card Merchant Hamilton Regionals (DTR)

decks
2 (5.3% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
10 7-0-3
overall winrate
85.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
74.7% avg ELO +11.1 per match
expected value
63.7% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
61.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1470 · median 1470 · range 1430–1509 (2 pilots with an ELO rating)
1043 Q1 1184 Q3 1430 1584
100% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Fractal 18.4% 5 4-0-1 90.0% 72.2% 63.9% +8.0
Fire Crux Merlin 7.9% 0
Wind Allies 7.9% 0
Fire Aggro 5.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.8% +18.8
Fire Crux Mage 5.3% 0
Fire Suited 5.3% 0
Water Aetherwing 5.3% 0
Water Genbu 5.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 63.3% +21.2
Wind Razorgale 5.3% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% +0.0
Fire Aetherwing 2.6% 0
Fire Exia 2.6% 0
Fire Slimes 2.6% 0
Fire Umbra Guardian 2.6% 0
Horse and Taxes 2.6% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 55.5% +8.7
Water Allies 2.6% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 2.6% 0
Wind Luxem Zander 2.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 63.7% +21.9
Wind Seiryuu 2.6% 0
Wind Shadowstrike 2.6% 0
Wind Wakeup Combo 2.6% 0
Decklists · 2 from this event

The 2 public Fire Firebloom Burn decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 18 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 18 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Ashwick Cremator -1.00 0 1 0
Vermilion Decree +1.00 1 0 0
Staggering Strike +1.00 1 0 0
Viridian Protective Trinket -1.00 0 1 0
Heated Vengeance +1.00 1 0 0
Smoke Out -1.00 0 1 0
Intensified Pyre +1.00 1 0 0
Demolition -1.00 0 1 0
Necklace of Foresight -1.00 0 1 0
Spark Alight -1.00 0 1 0
Hasty Messenger +1.00 1 0 0
Dazzling Courtesan +1.00 1 0 0
Blazing Throw +1.00 1 0 0
Fiery Interference -1.00 0 1 0
Fanatical Devotee -1.00 0 1 0
Fractal of Insight +1.00 1 0 0
Acolyte of Cultivation -1.00 0 1 0
Impact Hammer +1.00 1 0 0

JSON: /api/events/35764/archetypes/Fire Firebloom Burn