← HP WolvesDen - PTM Store Championship

Fire AggroTier 2

at HP WolvesDen - PTM Store Championship

decks
5 (15.6% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
16 4-10-2
overall winrate
31.2%
ELO-adjusted winrate
41.6% avg ELO -3.4 per match
expected value
46.0% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
48.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1196 · median 1122 · range 1041–1496 (5 pilots with an ELO rating)
936 Q1 1224 Q3 1364 1630
20% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 60% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Seiryuu 12.5% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.9% -5.0
Fire Crux Mage 6.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.4% +18.3
Water Fractal 6.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.0% -17.7
Wind Allies 6.2% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 53.9% +3.8
Wind Wakeup Combo 6.2% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 51.7% +1.6
Fire Crux Lorraine 3.1% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 39.2% -10.4
Fire Firebloom Burn 3.1% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 3.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 47.3% -4.3
Fire Slimes 3.1% 0
Fire Suited 3.1% 0
Horse and Taxes 3.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 34.4% -24.9
Slimes 3.1% 0
Water Aetherwing 3.1% 0
Water Genbu 3.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.3% +8.6
Water Ravishing Mill 3.1% 0
Wind Arcane 3.1% 0
Wind Byakko 3.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.5% -5.5
Wind Exia 3.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 48.4% -2.5
Wind Luxem Zander 3.1% 0
Wind Razorgale 3.1% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 53.5% +5.6
Wind Shadowstrike 3.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.7% -16.5
Decklists · 5 from this event

The 5 public Fire Aggro decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 29 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 29 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Reduce to Ash -1.00 0 1 0
Water Resonance Bauble -1.00 0 1 0
Fire Resonance Bauble -1.00 0 1 0
Staggering Strike +1.00 1 0 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +1.00 1 0 0
Lurking Assailant +1.00 1 0 0
Planted Explosive -1.00 0 1 0
Heated Vengeance +1.00 1 0 0
Rococo, Explosive Maven -1.00 0 1 0
Mystic Purifier -1.00 0 1 0
Grand Crusader's Ring +1.00 1 0 0
Intensified Pyre +1.00 1 0 0
Xiao Qiao, Cinderkeeper +1.00 1 0 0
Backup Charger -1.00 0 1 0
Peppered Chef +1.00 1 0 0
Wind Resonance Bauble -1.00 0 1 0
Hasty Messenger -1.00 0 1 0
Blinding Orb -1.00 0 1 0
Ignited Stab +1.00 1 0 0
Safeguard Amulet +1.00 1 0 0
Immolation Trap -1.00 0 1 0
Clumsy Apprentice +1.00 1 0 0
Quicksilver Grail -1.00 0 1 0
Corhazi Courier -1.00 0 1 0
Fiery Interference +1.00 1 0 0
Rending Flames -1.00 0 1 0
Nullifying Mirror +1.00 1 0 0
Censer of Restful Peace +1.00 1 0 0
Varuck, Smoldering Spire +1.00 1 0 0

JSON: /api/events/46421/archetypes/Fire Aggro