← CMD Regional Championship

Fire Crux MageTier 1

at CMD Regional Championship

decks
7 (21.2% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
30 19-9-2
overall winrate
66.7%
ELO-adjusted winrate
57.8% avg ELO +2.8 per match
expected value
56.4% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
53.0% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1347 · median 1393 · range 1033–1599 (7 pilots with an ELO rating)
1033 Q1 1205 Q3 1378 1599
57% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 29% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Luxem Assassin 15.2% 10 5-4-1 55.0% 53.6% 49.5% -0.2
Wind Allies 15.2% 5 2-2-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.1% +0.1
Fire Arcane 9.1% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 47.5% -2.4
Fire Erupting 9.1% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 58.9% +8.5
Fire Umbra Ranger 6.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.5% +10.4
Water Allies 6.1% 6 5-1-0 83.3% 70.0% 60.9% +5.8
Fire Neos 3.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 51.0% +0.9
Fire Vanitas 3.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.4% +18.3
Water Umbra Ranger 3.0% 0
Wind Crux Lorraine 3.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.7% +9.1
Wind Neos 3.0% 0
Wind Umbra Diana 3.0% 0
Decklists · 7 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 8 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down).

Winners more often ran: Crux Sight, Focused Flames, Honorable Vanguard. Losers more often ran: Resolute Stand, Viridian Protective Trinket, Blanche, Sheltering Saint.

Played more by winners
Crux Sight
Winning decks ran 2.2 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 8 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 4.
Focused Flames
Winning decks ran 0.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 8 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 5.
Honorable Vanguard
Winning decks ran 1.9 copies on average, losing decks 1.9.
Of 8 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 3.
Stalwart Shieldmate
Winning decks ran 3.9 copies on average, losing decks 3.8.
Of 8 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 5.
Fast Cure
Winning decks ran 3.5 copies on average, losing decks 3.4.
Of 8 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 3, both ran the same in 1.
Sudden Steel
Winning decks ran 0.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 8 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 5.
Played more by losers
Resolute Stand
Losing decks ran 3.0 copies on average, winning decks 2.6.
Of 8 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Viridian Protective Trinket
Losing decks ran 0.8 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 8 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Blanche, Sheltering Saint
Losing decks ran 2.4 copies on average, winning decks 2.0.
Of 8 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Devastating Blow
Losing decks ran 2.1 copies on average, winning decks 1.8.
Of 8 mirrors: the loser ran more in 5, the winner ran more in 3, both ran the same in 0.
Scry the Skies
Losing decks ran 1.8 copies on average, winning decks 1.2.
Of 8 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Exorcise Curses
Losing decks ran 2.5 copies on average, winning decks 2.6.
Of 8 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 3, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 32 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 12 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Resolute Stand -0.25 2 4 2
Viridian Protective Trinket -0.25 2 4 2
Tether in Flames -0.25 0 2 6
Incarnate Majesty -0.25 0 2 6
Blanche, Sheltering Saint -0.25 2 4 2
Devastating Blow -0.25 3 5 0
Flame-Rune Swordsman +0.25 2 0 6
Crux Sight +0.25 3 1 4
Scry the Skies -0.25 2 4 2
Spirit Blade: Ascension +0.25 2 0 0
Quicksilver Grail +0.25 2 0 6
Prismatic Edge +0.25 2 0 0
Ghosts of Pendragon +0.12 1 0 7
Exorcise Curses -0.12 3 4 1
Focused Flames +0.12 2 1 1
Honorable Vanguard +0.12 3 2 3
Vanish from Sight -0.12 1 2 0
Stalwart Shieldmate +0.12 2 1 5
Fast Cure +0.12 4 3 1
Sudden Steel +0.12 2 1 0
Cremation Ritual +0.12 4 3 1
Spark Alight -0.12 1 2 5
Bulwark Sword +0.12 2 1 5
Chalice of Blood +0.12 2 1 0
Incendiary Fractal +0.12 3 2 2
Meltdown +0.12 2 1 0
Morgan, Soul Guide -0.12 2 3 1
Scavenging Raccoon -0.12 0 1 0
Disintegrate +0.00 2 2 2
Hasty Messenger +0.00 1 1 6
Library Witch +0.00 2 2 4
Purge in Flames +0.00 2 2 3

JSON: /api/events/630/archetypes/Fire Crux Mage