Wind ShadowstrikeTier 1

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

The 21 public Wind Shadowstrike decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

• Christian 87 cards · placed #1
• Marshall7920 87 cards · placed #9
• BEEMOleo 84 cards · placed #10
• Champion 87 cards · placed #11
• Summoner 80 cards · placed #15
• Fish 87 cards · placed #16
• Jhin 84 cards · placed #33
• KevinC 85 cards · placed #34
• Royan 87 cards · placed #41
• ChiMing 87 cards · placed #44
• Tetsu 86 cards · placed #45
• Snowball049 85 cards · placed #48
• SpIn 87 cards · placed #51
• DreamDL 83 cards · placed #52
• Ikuri 87 cards · placed #53
• Bob 87 cards · placed #57
• Ryan 84 cards · placed #62
• YakultDoDo 87 cards · placed #64
• Jie 85 cards · placed #68
• MOON 85 cards · placed #78
• GerryEins 85 cards · placed #79

In 14 mirror matches (3 draws excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down).

Winners more often ran: Reprogram, Innervate Agility, Turbo Charge. Losers more often ran: Ensnaring Fumes, Arrow Trap, Slice and Dice.

↑ Played more by winners

Reprogram

Winning decks ran 2.4 copies on average, losing decks 1.6.

Of 14 mirrors: the winner ran more in 8, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 4.

Innervate Agility

Winning decks ran 1.1 copies on average, losing decks 0.4.

Of 14 mirrors: the winner ran more in 6, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 7.

Turbo Charge

Winning decks ran 0.6 copies on average, losing decks 0.4.

Of 14 mirrors: the winner ran more in 6, the loser ran more in 3, both ran the same in 5.

Tariff Ring

Winning decks ran 0.4 copies on average, losing decks 0.1.

Of 14 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 7.

Dream Fairy

Winning decks ran 3.8 copies on average, losing decks 3.4.

Of 14 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 8.

Cleansing Reunion

Winning decks ran 0.6 copies on average, losing decks 0.6.

Of 14 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 8.

↓ Played more by losers

Ensnaring Fumes

Losing decks ran 3.1 copies on average, winning decks 2.5.

Of 14 mirrors: the loser ran more in 7, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 6.

Arrow Trap

Losing decks ran 1.3 copies on average, winning decks 0.4.

Of 14 mirrors: the loser ran more in 6, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 7.

Slice and Dice

Losing decks ran 3.0 copies on average, winning decks 2.7.

Of 14 mirrors: the loser ran more in 6, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 6.

Veiling Breeze

Losing decks ran 3.5 copies on average, winning decks 3.3.

Of 14 mirrors: the loser ran more in 5, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 7.

Banned

Corhazi Outlook

Losing decks ran 3.9 copies on average, winning decks 3.8.

Of 14 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 10.

Viridian Protective Trinket

Losing decks ran 0.2 copies on average, winning decks 0.1.

Of 14 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 10.