← Ludo Regionals

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at Ludo Regionals

decks
6 (4.1% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
46 29-9-8
overall winrate
71.7%
ELO-adjusted winrate
64.4% avg ELO +5.0 per match
expected value
60.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
57.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1342 · median 1297 · range 1127–1685 (6 pilots with an ELO rating)
989 Q1 1163 Q3 1353 1685
33% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 17% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 19.7% 9 6-2-1 72.2% 65.4% 60.3% +4.7
Wind Allies 16.3% 7 3-4-0 42.9% 45.5% 40.2% -4.9
Wind Shadowstrike 14.3% 4 3-0-1 87.5% 68.8% 64.5% +9.3
Fire Crux Hybrid 9.5% 7 3-1-3 64.3% 59.1% 60.7% +5.4
Fire Erupting 6.8% 0
Fire Arcane 6.1% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 65.9% +11.9
Fire Aggro 5.4% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 66.6% +12.4
Fire Crux Mage 3.4% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 49.7% -0.2
Fire Slimes 3.4% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 59.0% +8.6
Wind Slimes 2.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 50.1% +0.1
Wind Overlord 1.4% 0
Fire Crux Merlin 0.7% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 0.7% 0
Fire Ravishing Mill 0.7% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 0.7% 0
Water Allies 0.7% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 65.3% +14.7
Water Crux Lorraine 0.7% 0
Water Crux Merlin 0.7% 0
Water Neos 0.7% 0
Water Overlord 0.7% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 65.3% +14.7
Water Umbra Diana 0.7% 0
Wind Lorraine 0.7% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 0.7% 0
Wind Tristan 0.7% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 49.7% -0.3
Decklists · 6 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 22 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 22 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Song of Frost -1.00 0 1 0
Resolute Stand -1.00 0 1 0
Frostbind +1.00 1 0 0
Diffusive Block -1.00 0 1 0
Vaporjet Shieldbearer +1.00 1 0 0
Revitalizing Cleanse -1.00 0 1 0
Tithe Proclamation -1.00 0 1 0
Waverider Protector -1.00 0 1 0
Snow Fairy -1.00 0 1 0
Freezing Steel +1.00 1 0 0
Cerulean Decree +1.00 1 0 0
Fractal of Intrusion +1.00 1 0 0
Savage Smash +1.00 1 0 0
Turbo Charge -1.00 0 1 0
Blinding Orb +1.00 1 0 0
Cell Sharpshooter +1.00 1 0 0
Water Barrier -1.00 0 1 0
Quicksilver Grail +1.00 1 0 0
Powercell -1.00 0 1 0
Incapacitate +1.00 1 0 0
Tariff Ring -1.00 0 1 0
Lunete, Frostbinder Priest -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/7332/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill