← Hobby Lords Lower Hutt AMB Regionals

Wind RazorgaleTier 1

at Hobby Lords Lower Hutt AMB Regionals

decks
4 (12.1% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
20 9-7-4
overall winrate
55.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
54.3% avg ELO +1.7 per match
expected value
51.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
52.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1359 · median 1388 · range 1259–1401 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
991 Q1 1225 Q3 1401 1599
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Ravishing Mill 15.2% 5 3-1-1 70.0% 61.1% 57.1% +4.1
Water Allies 12.1% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 42.1% -7.5
Fire Aggro 9.1% 0
Fire Crux Mage 9.1% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 50.6% +0.6
Slimes 9.1% 4 3-1-0 75.0% 62.5% 59.2% +5.9
Water Penguin Mill 9.1% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 56.2% +5.9
Water Crux Mage 6.1% 2 0-0-2 50.0% 50.0% 52.3% +2.2
Fire Luxem Assassin 3.0% 0
Fire Umbra Diana 3.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.2% +8.3
Water Polkhawk 3.0% 0
Wind Allies 3.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.0% -17.5
Wind Astra Cleric 3.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 47.7% -3.7
Wind Shadowstrike 3.0% 0
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Wind Razorgale decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 24 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 24 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Cleansing Reunion -1.00 0 2 0
Cyclical Breeze -1.00 0 2 0
Slimeshield +1.00 2 0 0
Scavenging Raccoon +1.00 2 0 0
Dream Fairy +1.00 2 0 0
Scatter Essence +1.00 2 0 0
Reclaim +0.50 1 0 1
Resolute Stand -0.50 0 1 0
Aesan Protector -0.50 0 1 1
Water Resonance Bauble +0.50 1 0 1
Unbroken Mustang -0.50 0 1 0
Fire Resonance Bauble +0.50 1 0 1
Diablerie -0.50 0 1 0
Stifling Trap -0.50 0 1 1
Bagua of Cardinal Fate +0.50 1 0 1
Verdigris Decree -0.50 0 1 0
Ardent Cloudstriker +0.50 1 0 1
Nullifying Mirror +0.50 1 0 1
Zephyr +0.50 1 0 1
Blessed Clergy -0.50 0 1 0
Eternal Magistrate -0.50 0 1 0
Swift Recruit -0.50 0 1 0
Escape the Wreckage -0.50 0 1 0
Azure Protective Trinket -0.50 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/14144/archetypes/Wind Razorgale