← Whimsy Regionals - Abyssal Heaven

Fire AggroTier 1

at Whimsy Regionals - Abyssal Heaven

decks
10 (9.1% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
58 27-27-4
overall winrate
50.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
49.7% avg ELO -0.1 per match
expected value
49.0% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
49.0% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1260 · median 1201 · range 1002–1685 (10 pilots with an ELO rating)
936 Q1 1151 Q3 1386 1685
20% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 40% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Allies 14.5% 6 3-3-0 50.0% 50.0% 49.0% -0.5
Water Fractal 11.8% 5 2-3-0 40.0% 44.4% 53.5% +2.0
Wind Shadowstrike 7.3% 5 2-3-0 40.0% 44.4% 33.9% -9.3
Fire Crux Mage 4.5% 3 0-2-1 16.7% 35.7% 36.5% -10.0
Fire Suzaku 4.5% 4 3-1-0 75.0% 62.5% 60.3% +6.6
Water Genbu 4.5% 7 2-5-0 28.6% 36.4% 40.4% -4.8
Fire Cinderbloom Combo 3.6% 0
Fire Tonoris 2.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.4% +5.5
Fire Arcane 1.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.7% +4.3
Fire Exia 1.8% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 1.8% 0
Fire Seiryuu 1.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 41.8% -13.1
Fire Slimes 1.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.6% -11.9
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.8% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 47.1% -2.7
Slimes 1.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.9% +14.2
Water Allies 1.8% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 56.8% +6.5
Water Astra Cleric 1.8% 0
Wind Byakko 1.8% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 60.3% +9.9
Wind Crux Mage 1.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.0% +3.3
Wind Exia 1.8% 0
Wind Lorraine 1.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 62.7% +20.4
Wind Luxem Zander 1.8% 0
Wind Razorgale 1.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.9% +7.8
Wind Seiryuu 1.8% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 47.4% -2.5
Fire Dawn of Ashes 0.9% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.7% -11.6
Fire Polkhawk 0.9% 0
Water Crux Mage 0.9% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 41.7% -13.3
Water Dawn of Ashes 0.9% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 54.4% +7.0
Water Neos 0.9% 0
Water Penguin Mill 0.9% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 47.4% -4.1
Water Tera Mage 0.9% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 60.3% +9.9
Water Tonoris 0.9% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.7% -11.7
Wind Astra Cleric 0.9% 0
Wind Beast 0.9% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 49.0% -1.7
Wind Neos 0.9% 0
Wind Overlord 0.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 57.2% +11.6
Wind Polkhawk 0.9% 0
Wind Ravishing Mill 0.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 60.0% +16.0
Wind Slice & Dice 0.9% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 52.9% +2.8
Decklists · 10 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 3 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 3 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Fire Resonance Bauble, Xiao Qiao, Cinderkeeper, Clumsy Apprentice. Losers more often ran: Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa, Woodland Squirrels, Poisoned Dagger.

Played more by winners
Fire Resonance Bauble
Winning decks ran 0.7 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Xiao Qiao, Cinderkeeper
Winning decks ran 2.3 copies on average, losing decks 1.7.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Clumsy Apprentice
Winning decks ran 2.3 copies on average, losing decks 2.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Played more by losers
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa
Losing decks ran 2.7 copies on average, winning decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Woodland Squirrels
Losing decks ran 3.7 copies on average, winning decks 2.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Poisoned Dagger
Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Show all 42 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 36 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Hasty Messenger +0.67 2 0 0
Fire Resonance Bauble +0.33 2 1 0
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa -0.33 1 2 0
Heated Vengeance +0.33 1 0 2
Woodland Squirrels -0.33 1 2 0
Surging Bolt +0.33 1 0 0
Xiao Qiao, Cinderkeeper +0.33 2 1 0
Safeguard Amulet -0.33 0 1 2
Clumsy Apprentice +0.33 2 1 0
Poisoned Dagger -0.33 1 2 0
Sadi, Blood Harvester -0.33 0 1 0
Vicious Slice -0.33 0 1 0
Reduce to Ash +0.00 1 1 0
Veteran Blazebearer +0.00 1 1 1
Water Resonance Bauble +0.00 1 1 1
Captivating Cutthroat +0.00 1 1 1
Planted Explosive +0.00 1 1 1
Varuckan Soulknife +0.00 1 1 1
Mercenary's Blade +0.00 1 1 1
Mark the Target +0.00 1 1 1
Wind Resonance Bauble +0.00 1 1 1
Poisoned Coating Oil +0.00 1 1 0
Ignited Stab +0.00 1 1 0
Corhazi Courier +0.00 1 1 1
Brackish Lutist +0.00 1 1 0
Rending Flames +0.00 1 1 1
Censer of Restful Peace +0.00 1 1 0
Zander, Prepared Scout +0.00 1 1 1
Evasive Maneuvers +0.00 1 1 0
Unbroken Mustang +0.00 1 1 0
Polkhawk, Boisterous Riot +0.00 1 1 0
Framework Sidearm +0.00 1 1 0
Quickdraw Piercer +0.00 1 1 0
Automaton Bomber +0.00 1 1 0
Flamebolt Arbalist +0.00 1 1 0
Incendiary Shot +0.00 1 1 0
Contraband Revolver +0.00 1 1 0
Tinderflare Pivot +0.00 1 1 0
Dazzling Courtesan +0.00 1 1 0
Volatile Fusilier +0.00 1 1 0
Airship Cannoneer +0.00 1 1 0
Dodge Roll +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/22130/archetypes/Fire Aggro