← Illusive Webcam Regionals

Wind ShadowstrikeTier 1

at Illusive Webcam Regionals

decks
6 (9.5% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
31 12-11-8
overall winrate
51.6%
ELO-adjusted winrate
50.2% avg ELO +0.1 per match
expected value
52.7% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
51.4% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1410 · median 1414 · range 1288–1543 (6 pilots with an ELO rating)
1094 Q1 1309 Q3 1491 1656
33% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 33% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Aggro 14.3% 4 3-0-1 87.5% 68.8% 58.4% +5.4
Wind Seiryuu 11.1% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 54.7% +4.5
Fire Crux Lorraine 9.5% 8 2-4-2 37.5% 41.7% 47.4% -1.2
Fire Crux Mage 7.9% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 42.3% -7.4
Wind Allies 6.3% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 51.2% +1.2
Fire Aetherwing 4.8% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 50.5% +0.4
Water Allies 4.8% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 53.7% +3.5
Fire Suited 3.2% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 49.6% -0.6
Fire Suzaku 3.2% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 55.9% +5.7
Water Fractal 3.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.9% -4.9
Water Neos 3.2% 0
Fire Exia 1.6% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 47.4% -4.1
Fire Firebloom Burn 1.6% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.9% -11.4
Fire Slimes 1.6% 0
Fire Umbra Guardian 1.6% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.6% 0
Horse and Taxes 1.6% 0
Water Genbu 1.6% 0
Water Ravishing Mill 1.6% 0
Water Umbra Guardian 1.6% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 1.6% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 1.6% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 45.0% -8.0
Wind Luxem Zander 1.6% 0
Wind Wakeup Combo 1.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.2% +3.5
Decklists · 6 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 4 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 4 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Brackish Lutist, Innervate Agility, Resolute Stand. Losers more often ran: Crystallized Destiny, Safeguard Amulet, Spirelle, Schwartz Queen.

Played more by winners
Brackish Lutist
Winning decks ran 1.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Innervate Agility
Winning decks ran 1.8 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Ensnaring Fumes
Winning decks ran 2.8 copies on average, losing decks 2.8.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Played more by losers
Crystallized Destiny
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Safeguard Amulet
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Spirelle, Schwartz Queen
Losing decks ran 1.2 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Regal Inquisition
Losing decks ran 2.2 copies on average, winning decks 2.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Blanche, Sheltering Saint
Losing decks ran 1.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Reclaim
Losing decks ran 3.8 copies on average, winning decks 3.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 29 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 18 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Crystallized Destiny -0.75 0 3 1
Safeguard Amulet -0.75 0 3 1
Spirelle, Schwartz Queen -0.75 0 3 1
Winbless Lookout -0.50 0 2 2
Regal Inquisition -0.50 1 3 0
Dungeon Guide -0.50 0 2 2
Blanche, Sheltering Saint -0.50 1 3 0
Brackish Lutist +0.50 3 1 0
Innervate Agility +0.50 3 1 0
Tempest Downfall +0.50 2 0 0
Annul Spell +0.50 2 0 0
Resolute Stand +0.25 2 1 0
Ensnaring Fumes +0.25 2 1 1
Mastermind Scheme +0.25 1 0 3
Reclaim -0.25 1 2 1
Stifling Trap +0.25 1 0 3
Slice and Dice +0.25 1 0 3
Nullifying Lantern -0.25 0 1 3
Tariff Ring +0.25 1 0 3
Zephyr +0.25 1 0 3
Dream Fairy -0.25 0 1 3
Censer of Restful Peace -0.25 1 2 0
Cleansing Reunion +0.25 1 0 0
Tristan, Shadowreaver +0.25 1 0 0
Turbo Charge +0.00 1 1 1
Scatter Essence +0.00 1 1 2
Penumbral Waltz +0.00 1 1 2
Heavenly Guide +0.00 1 1 0
Nullifying Mirror +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/31437/archetypes/Wind Shadowstrike