← AGORA HOBBY AMB Store Championship

SlimesTier 1

at AGORA HOBBY AMB Store Championship

decks
13 (17.3% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
78 38-25-15
overall winrate
58.3%
ELO-adjusted winrate
56.4% avg ELO +2.2 per match
expected value
55.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
54.5% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1285 · median 1283 · range 1100–1539 (13 pilots with an ELO rating)
1057 Q1 1178 Q3 1392 1633
23% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 15% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Shadowstrike 13.3% 6 3-2-1 58.3% 55.0% 53.2% +1.7
Fire Crux Mage 12.0% 16 6-6-4 50.0% 50.0% 46.9% -1.2
Water Ravishing Mill 10.7% 7 4-1-2 71.4% 63.6% 67.5% +8.8
Water Tera Mage 9.3% 12 8-3-1 70.8% 65.6% 62.8% +5.5
Wind Allies 8.0% 8 3-2-3 56.2% 54.2% 46.6% -1.6
Fire Exia 4.0% 4 2-2-0 50.0% 50.0% 46.3% -2.4
Fire Luxem Assassin 4.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 54.3% +4.1
Fire Arcane 2.7% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 65.6% +14.9
Fire Slimes 2.7% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 54.1% +6.5
Wind Astra Cleric 2.7% 5 1-2-2 40.0% 44.4% 53.7% +2.2
Wind Cats 2.7% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 55.7% +4.3
Wind Razorgale 2.7% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 44.7% -4.0
Fire Jin 1.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 57.0% +11.1
Water Fractal 1.3% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 53.4% +3.2
Water Kongming 1.3% 0
Water Silvie 1.3% 0
Wind Silvie 1.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.0% +8.0
Wind Slimes 1.3% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 55.7% +4.3
Wind Umbra Ranger 1.3% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 39.3% -10.3
Decklists · 13 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 7 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 7 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Kind Beastcaller, Reprogram, Gaia's Songbird. Losers more often ran: Nullifying Lantern, Hymn of Gaia's Grace, Scavenging Raccoon.

Played more by winners
Kind Beastcaller
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 0.6.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 6, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Reprogram
Winning decks ran 2.4 copies on average, losing decks 1.1.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Gaia's Songbird
Winning decks ran 3.4 copies on average, losing decks 2.9.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Beastbond Ears
Winning decks ran 0.9 copies on average, losing decks 0.4.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 4.
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 1.9.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 1.
Blanche, Sheltering Saint
Winning decks ran 0.9 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Played more by losers
Nullifying Lantern
Losing decks ran 0.6 copies on average, winning decks 0.1.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Hymn of Gaia's Grace
Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 4.
Scavenging Raccoon
Losing decks ran 2.4 copies on average, winning decks 0.6.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 5, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 0.
Slime King
Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.6.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 4.
Slimeshield
Losing decks ran 3.9 copies on average, winning decks 3.7.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 4.
Slime's Blessing
Losing decks ran 1.4 copies on average, winning decks 1.1.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Show all 36 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 21 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Kind Beastcaller +0.86 6 0 0
Reprogram +0.57 4 0 2
Nullifying Lantern -0.43 1 4 0
Hymn of Gaia's Grace -0.43 0 3 0
Scavenging Raccoon -0.43 2 5 0
Gaia's Songbird +0.43 4 1 2
Beastbond Ears +0.43 3 0 3
Resolute Stand +0.29 4 2 1
Blanche, Sheltering Saint +0.29 3 1 0
Turbo Charge -0.29 0 2 0
Twilight Slime +0.29 3 1 0
Tariff Ring -0.29 0 2 0
Verdant Slime -0.29 0 2 0
Horn of Beastcalling +0.14 1 0 6
Blissful Calling +0.14 1 0 6
Slime King -0.14 1 2 2
Slimeshield -0.14 1 2 4
Beastbond Boots -0.14 0 1 6
Slime's Blessing -0.14 2 3 1
Backup Charger +0.14 1 0 6
Soothing Disillusion -0.14 0 1 0
Stonescale Band -0.14 0 1 6
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.14 1 0 0
Lead with Force +0.14 1 0 0
Slime Totem -0.14 0 1 0
Heavenly Guide +0.14 1 0 0
Tera Sight -0.14 0 1 1
Entrancing Filigree -0.14 0 1 1
Nullifying Mirror -0.14 0 1 1
Spellshield: Tera +0.14 1 0 0
Ordinary Bear -0.14 0 1 0
Lustrous Slime +0.00 2 2 3
Baby Blue Slime +0.00 2 2 0
Slime Eruption +0.00 1 1 5
Escape the Wreckage +0.00 1 1 5
Beastbond Paws +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/13058/archetypes/Slimes