Water Ravishing MillTier 1

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

The 8 public Water Ravishing Mill decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

• Zetdivx 83 cards · placed #1
• HiroShishou 81 cards · placed #4
• ssean 82 cards · placed #32
• Gomori 81 cards · placed #33
• 727 81 cards · placed #38
• Daiquiri 85 cards · placed #39
• Aperture 83 cards · placed #65
• Pierrot 83 cards · placed #71

In 3 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 3 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Glacial Guidance, Seaside Ringleader, Tidal Lock. Losers more often ran: Frostbind.

↑ Played more by winners

Glacial Guidance

Winning decks ran 1.3 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.

Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 0.

Seaside Ringleader

Winning decks ran 3.3 copies on average, losing decks 2.3.

Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.

Tidal Lock

Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.

Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.

↓ Played more by losers

Frostbind

Losing decks ran 2.7 copies on average, winning decks 1.3.

Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.