← Illusive Webcam Regionals

Water FractalTier 1

at Illusive Webcam Regionals

decks
12 (22.6% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
55 28-20-7
overall winrate
57.3%
ELO-adjusted winrate
51.8% avg ELO +0.6 per match
expected value
52.9% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
50.8% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1418 · median 1439 · range 1239–1638 (12 pilots with an ELO rating)
1084 Q1 1295 Q3 1459 1750
42% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 33% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Aggro 13.2% 7 3-2-2 57.1% 54.5% 52.4% +1.2
Wind Allies 11.3% 12 6-5-1 54.2% 53.1% 51.0% +0.4
Wind Shadowstrike 11.3% 9 3-4-2 44.4% 46.2% 47.9% -1.0
Fire Suzaku 5.7% 4 2-2-0 50.0% 50.0% 49.0% -0.7
Fire Cinderbloom Combo 3.8% 4 3-1-0 75.0% 62.5% 51.9% +1.2
Fire Luxem Assassin 3.8% 4 1-2-1 37.5% 43.8% 47.6% -1.6
Water Allies 3.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.3% +3.6
Wind Seiryuu 3.8% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 53.9% +2.9
Fire Byakko 1.9% 0
Fire Crux Mage 1.9% 0
Fire Slimes 1.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.7% +7.6
Slimes 1.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.5% +5.6
Water Crux Lorraine 1.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.3% +3.6
Water Crux Mage 1.9% 0
Water Genbu 1.9% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 52.2% +2.1
Water Slice & Dice 1.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 51.3% +2.1
Wind Astra Cleric 1.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.9% +4.6
Wind Byakko 1.9% 0
Wind Luxem Zander 1.9% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 47.2% -4.5
Wind Ravishing Mill 1.9% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 48.7% -2.0
Wind Slice & Dice 1.9% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 50.1% +0.1
Decklists · 12 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 7 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 7 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Fire Resonance Bauble, Chill to the Bone, Quicksilver Grail. Losers more often ran: Lost in Thought, Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa, Nullifying Lantern.

Played more by winners
Fire Resonance Bauble
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.6.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 4.
Chill to the Bone
Winning decks ran 1.3 copies on average, losing decks 0.6.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Quicksilver Grail
Winning decks ran 0.6 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Jianyu, Fate's Premonition
Winning decks ran 1.9 copies on average, losing decks 1.3.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Awakened Deacon
Winning decks ran 0.3 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 4.
Staggering Strike
Winning decks ran 1.6 copies on average, losing decks 0.9.
Of 7 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Played more by losers
Lost in Thought Banned
Lost in Thought
Losing decks ran 4.0 copies on average, winning decks 2.6.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 4.
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa
Losing decks ran 2.4 copies on average, winning decks 0.9.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Nullifying Lantern
Losing decks ran 0.6 copies on average, winning decks 0.3.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 1.
Portentous Tanggu
Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.4.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Grand Crusader's Ring
Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.6.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 4.
Fractal of Refreshment
Losing decks ran 2.9 copies on average, winning decks 2.7.
Of 7 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 4.
Show all 35 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 18 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Fire Resonance Bauble +0.43 3 0 4
Lost in Thought -0.43 0 3 4
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa -0.43 1 4 1
Chill to the Bone +0.43 4 1 0
Song of Frost -0.29 0 2 1
Water Resonance Bauble +0.29 2 0 5
Torpid Fractal +0.29 2 0 0
Novice Healer +0.29 2 0 0
Nullifying Lantern -0.29 2 4 0
Wind Resonance Bauble +0.29 2 0 5
Portentous Tanggu -0.29 1 3 2
Quicksilver Grail +0.29 3 1 1
Coronation Ceremony -0.29 0 2 0
Wand of Frost -0.29 0 2 0
Grand Crusader's Ring -0.14 1 2 3
Jianyu, Fate's Premonition +0.14 3 2 2
Awakened Deacon +0.14 2 1 0
Fractal of Refreshment -0.14 1 2 4
Tariff Ring +0.14 1 0 6
Wildheart Lyre -0.14 0 1 0
Staggering Strike +0.14 3 2 0
Frozen Dismissal -0.14 0 1 1
Xuchang, Frozen Citadel +0.14 1 0 0
Expel the Departed +0.14 1 0 0
Cerulean Decree -0.14 0 1 0
Frostbind +0.00 3 3 1
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.00 1 1 5
Unstable Fractal +0.00 2 2 3
Blanche, Sheltering Saint +0.00 1 1 0
Fast Cure +0.00 3 3 1
Reprogram +0.00 1 1 0
Extricating Touch +0.00 3 3 0
Nullifying Mirror +0.00 1 1 5
Censer of Restful Peace +0.00 1 1 5
Disenchant +0.00 2 2 0

JSON: /api/events/22832/archetypes/Water Fractal