← DeckaDice QLD DTR Regionals

Fire SuzakuTier 1

at DeckaDice QLD DTR Regionals

decks
3 (8.6% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
18 13-5-0
overall winrate
72.2%
ELO-adjusted winrate
64.3% avg ELO +5.6 per match
expected value
56.9% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
55.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1318 · median 1332 · range 1211–1410 (3 pilots with an ELO rating)
1002 Q1 1156 Q3 1299 1617
67% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 11.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 57.0% +11.2
Water Aetherwing 11.4% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 60.3% +9.9
Wind Allies 8.6% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 39.0% -8.2
Wind Shadowstrike 8.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 60.4% +16.6
Fire Crux Mage 5.7% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 51.7% +1.7
Wind Seiryuu 5.7% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 56.5% +6.2
Fire Crux Lorraine 2.9% 0
Fire Firebloom Burn 2.9% 0
Fire Lorraine 2.9% 0
Fire Oblation 2.9% 0
Fire Silvie 2.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.4% +13.5
Fire Umbra Ciel 2.9% 0
Water Astra Cleric 2.9% 0
Water Crux Mage 2.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.6% +10.6
Water Genbu 2.9% 0
Water Ravishing Mill 2.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.6% +9.0
Water Umbra Guardian 2.9% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 49.9% -0.1
Wind Crux Lorraine 2.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.4% +15.0
Wind Lorraine 2.9% 0
Wind Tera Silvie 2.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.9% +14.3
Decklists · 3 from this event

The 3 public Fire Suzaku decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 3 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 3 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Resolute Stand, Expose Darkness, Staggering Strike. Losers more often ran: March Hare, Mottled Host, Reduce to Ash, Ignis Deus.

Played more by winners
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Expose Darkness
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Staggering Strike
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Embercrypt Burn
Winning decks ran 2.7 copies on average, losing decks 2.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Liminal Guide
Winning decks ran 2.7 copies on average, losing decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Sword of Seeking
Winning decks ran 0.7 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Played more by losers
March Hare, Mottled Host
Losing decks ran 1.3 copies on average, winning decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Reduce to Ash
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Ignis Deus
Losing decks ran 1.3 copies on average, winning decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Rococo, Explosive Maven
Losing decks ran 1.3 copies on average, winning decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Smoke Out
Losing decks ran 1.3 copies on average, winning decks 1.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Intensified Pyre
Losing decks ran 2.7 copies on average, winning decks 1.0.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Show all 38 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 18 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Heated Vengeance -0.67 0 2 1
Restorative Flame +0.67 2 0 1
Nullifying Mirror +0.67 2 0 1
Fatestone of Unrelenting -0.67 0 2 0
Pelagic Fatestone -0.67 0 2 0
Baby Red Slime -0.67 0 2 0
Lavaplume Fatestone -0.67 0 2 0
Bauble of Abundance -0.67 0 2 0
Dire Requiem -0.67 0 2 0
Resolute Stand +0.33 2 1 0
March Hare, Mottled Host -0.33 1 2 0
Reduce to Ash -0.33 1 2 0
Expose Darkness +0.33 2 1 0
Staggering Strike +0.33 2 1 0
Ignis Deus -0.33 1 2 0
Embercrypt Burn +0.33 2 1 0
Rococo, Explosive Maven -0.33 1 2 0
Smoke Out -0.33 1 2 0
Liminal Guide +0.33 2 1 0
Arthur, Young Heir +0.33 1 0 0
Sword of Seeking +0.33 2 1 0
Intensified Pyre -0.33 1 2 0
Cinder Geyser +0.33 2 1 0
Beastbond Boots +0.33 1 0 0
Three of Hearts +0.33 2 1 0
Fluffy Shopkeep -0.33 1 2 0
Demolition +0.33 1 0 2
Creative Shock +0.33 2 1 0
Spark Alight +0.33 2 1 0
Dazzling Courtesan -0.33 1 2 0
Blazing Throw +0.33 1 0 2
Shatter the Brittle +0.33 2 1 0
Immolation Trap +0.33 1 0 0
Guo Jia, Blessed Scion -0.33 0 1 2
Fiery Interference +0.33 2 1 0
Censer of Restful Peace -0.33 1 2 0
Annul Spell +0.33 2 1 0
Suzaku's Command +0.33 2 1 0

JSON: /api/events/31593/archetypes/Fire Suzaku