← DTR Regionals @ Hobby Lords Lower Hutt

SlimesTier 2

at DTR Regionals @ Hobby Lords Lower Hutt

decks
2 (5.6% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
11 1-8-2
overall winrate
18.2%
ELO-adjusted winrate
28.5% avg ELO -9.4 per match
expected value
42.7% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
43.3% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1127 · median 1127 · range 1118–1136 (2 pilots with an ELO rating)
921 Q1 1147 Q3 1347 1599
0% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 100% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Aggro 11.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.4% -17.0
Fire Crux Mage 8.3% 0
Fire Firebloom Burn 8.3% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 41.0% -14.5
Fire Crux Merlin 5.6% 0
Fire Exia 5.6% 0
Fire Umbra Guardian 5.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.5% +15.3
Water Genbu 5.6% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 44.3% -5.5
Wind Seiryuu 5.6% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.5% -12.0
Wind Wakeup Combo 5.6% 0
Fire Aetherwing 2.8% 0
Fire Suited 2.8% 0
Fire Suzaku 2.8% 0
Fire Umbra Ciel 2.8% 0
Water Allies 2.8% 0
Water Astra Ranger 2.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.3% -12.2
Water Fractal 2.8% 0
Water Ravishing Mill 2.8% 0
Water Seiryuu 2.8% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 48.7% -2.0
Water Umbra Ciel 2.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 38.0% -19.3
Wind Allies 2.8% 0
Wind Astra Cleric 2.8% 0
Wind Lorraine 2.8% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 34.1% -15.2
Wind Shadowstrike 2.8% 0
Decklists · 2 from this event

The 2 public Slimes decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 32 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 32 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Ethereal Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Key Slime Pudding +1.00 1 0 0
Horn of Beastcalling -1.00 0 1 0
Beastbond Paws +1.00 1 0 0
Storm Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Dungeon Guide -1.00 0 1 0
Blissful Calling -1.00 0 1 0
Blue Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Idle Thoughts +1.00 1 0 0
Lead with Force -1.00 0 1 0
Slime King +1.00 1 0 0
Green Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Slimeshield -1.00 0 1 0
Avatar of Gaia -1.00 0 1 0
Smack with Flute -1.00 0 1 0
Bauble of Mending +1.00 1 0 0
Slime Totem +1.00 1 0 0
Slime's Blessing -1.00 0 1 0
Lustrous Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Covenant of Thorns -1.00 0 1 0
Nullifying Lantern -1.00 0 1 0
Baby Blue Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Song of Nurturing +1.00 1 0 0
Stalwart Shieldmate -1.00 0 1 0
Scavenging Raccoon -1.00 0 1 0
Tera Sight -1.00 0 1 0
Slime Eruption -1.00 0 1 0
Red Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Stonescale Band -1.00 0 1 0
Baby Green Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Verdant Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Gaia's Blessing -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/32156/archetypes/Slimes