← MRC Massachusetts Regionals

SlimesTier 2

at MRC Massachusetts Regionals

decks
2 (4.8% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
10 1-8-1
overall winrate
15.0%
ELO-adjusted winrate
28.0% avg ELO -9.8 per match
expected value
39.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
40.5% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1147 · median 1147 · range 1110–1185 (2 pilots with an ELO rating)
976 Q1 1162 Q3 1329 1656
0% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 50% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Ravishing Mill 14.3% 0
Wind Shadowstrike 14.3% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 35.5% -13.9
Fire Aggro 11.9% 0
Wind Allies 11.9% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.2% -15.6
Fire Crux Hybrid 9.5% 0
Water Allies 7.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.6% -15.0
Fire Erupting 4.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.3% -15.5
Fire Arcane 2.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.1% +14.5
Fire Slimes 2.4% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 2.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.7% -14.8
Norm Tera Silvie 2.4% 0
Water Crux Mage 2.4% 0
Water Crux Merlin 2.4% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.3% +0.4
Wind Diana 2.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.2% -15.6
Wind Luxem Assassin 2.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 44.4% -8.9
Wind Slimes 2.4% 0
Decklists · 2 from this event

The 2 public Slimes decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 28 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 28 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Ethereal Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Horn of Beastcalling +1.00 1 0 0
Vampiric Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Beastbond Paws -1.00 0 1 0
Water Resonance Bauble -1.00 0 1 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +1.00 1 0 0
Fire Resonance Bauble -1.00 0 1 0
Dungeon Guide +1.00 1 0 0
Slime King +1.00 1 0 0
Green Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Slimeshield -1.00 0 1 0
Slime's Blessing -1.00 0 1 0
Covenant of Thorns +1.00 1 0 0
Melodious Flute -1.00 0 1 0
Baby Blue Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Bestial Frenzy +1.00 1 0 0
Gaia's Songbird +1.00 1 0 0
Chalice of Blood -1.00 0 1 0
Stonescale Band +1.00 1 0 0
Red Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Tariff Ring -1.00 0 1 0
Verdant Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Gaia's Blessing +1.00 1 0 0
Escape the Wreckage +1.00 1 0 0
Twilight Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Bauble of Abundance -1.00 0 1 0
Slime Nexus -1.00 0 1 0
Beastbond Ears +1.00 1 0 0

JSON: /api/events/6057/archetypes/Slimes