← 11/23 新莊貓 Mortal Ambition Regionals 北部場

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at 11/23 新莊貓 Mortal Ambition Regionals 北部場

decks
9 (11.2% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
44 21-19-4
overall winrate
52.3%
ELO-adjusted winrate
52.0% avg ELO +0.7 per match
expected value
51.1% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
51.0% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1312 · median 1319 · range 1074–1533 (9 pilots with an ELO rating)
1043 Q1 1201 Q3 1415 1730
22% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 22% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 17.5% 8 2-5-1 31.2% 37.5% 43.8% -3.0
Wind Shadowstrike 12.5% 4 3-0-1 87.5% 68.8% 60.3% +6.6
Fire Exia 7.5% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 63.0% +12.4
Wind Razorgale 7.5% 5 3-2-0 60.0% 55.6% 60.4% +6.0
Fire Crux Mage 6.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 38.7% -18.0
Wind Allies 5.0% 4 1-2-1 37.5% 43.8% 44.8% -3.3
Fire Aggro 3.8% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 41.9% -6.1
Water Penguin Mill 3.8% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.4% -15.4
Wind Astra Cleric 3.8% 4 3-1-0 75.0% 62.5% 56.6% +4.2
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.5% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.2% +13.1
Fire Slimes 2.5% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 59.0% +8.7
Wind Tera Mage 2.5% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.2% -17.3
Fire Arcane 1.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.9% +19.0
Fire Astra Cleric 1.2% 0
Fire Crux Merlin 1.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.6% +13.8
Water Allies 1.2% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 37.3% -12.2
Water Astra Cleric 1.2% 0
Water Neos 1.2% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 56.9% +5.1
Water Tera Mage 1.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.3% -15.5
Wind Crux Lorraine 1.2% 0
Wind Crux Mage 1.2% 0
Wind Kongming 1.2% 0
Wind Umbra Ranger 1.2% 0
Decklists · 9 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 4 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 4 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Frostbind, Revitalizing Cleanse, Torpid Fractal. Losers more often ran: Ravishing Finale, Tidal Lock, Fractal of Intrusion.

Played more by winners
Frostbind
Winning decks ran 2.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Revitalizing Cleanse
Winning decks ran 1.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Torpid Fractal
Winning decks ran 1.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Freezing Hail
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Nullifying Mirror
Winning decks ran 0.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Song of Frost
Winning decks ran 2.2 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Played more by losers
Ravishing Finale
Losing decks ran 4.0 copies on average, winning decks 3.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Tidal Lock
Losing decks ran 3.8 copies on average, winning decks 1.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Fractal of Intrusion
Losing decks ran 3.5 copies on average, winning decks 2.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Primordial Ritual
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Spirit of Water
Losing decks ran 0.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 42 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 29 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Frostbind +0.75 3 0 0
Revitalizing Cleanse +0.75 3 0 1
Ravishing Finale -0.75 0 3 1
Tidal Lock -0.75 0 3 1
Orb of Sealing +0.50 2 0 2
Torpid Fractal +0.50 3 1 0
Staggering Strike -0.50 0 2 0
Grand Crusader's Ring -0.50 0 2 2
Seasprite Diver +0.50 2 0 0
Scavenging Raccoon -0.50 0 2 0
Fractal of Intrusion -0.50 1 3 0
Freezing Hail +0.50 3 1 0
Glacial Guidance -0.50 0 2 0
Blinding Orb +0.50 2 0 2
Water Barrier -0.50 0 2 0
Quicksilver Grail +0.50 2 0 0
Tidestone Bovine +0.50 2 0 2
Nullifying Mirror +0.50 3 1 0
Song of Frost +0.25 2 1 1
Primordial Ritual -0.25 1 2 0
Spirit of Serene Water -0.25 0 1 3
Snow Fairy +0.25 2 1 1
Strategem of Myriad Ice +0.25 2 1 0
Tonoris, Lone Mercenary -0.25 0 1 2
Spirit of Water -0.25 1 2 0
Rippleback Terrapin +0.25 1 0 0
Seaside Ringleader +0.25 1 0 0
Safeguard Amulet +0.25 1 0 1
Crimson Protective Trinket +0.25 1 0 0
Silvie, Wilds Whisperer +0.25 1 0 1
Tithe Proclamation -0.25 0 1 0
Vaporjet Shieldbearer -0.25 0 1 0
Cell Sharpshooter -0.25 0 1 0
Diffusive Block +0.00 1 1 2
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.00 1 1 2
Hailstorm Guard +0.00 1 1 0
Cerulean Decree +0.00 1 1 2
Bulwark Sword +0.00 1 1 1
Tariff Ring +0.00 1 1 1
Fractal of Polar Depths +0.00 1 1 0
Freezing Steel +0.00 1 1 0
Tideholder Claymore +0.00 1 1 1

JSON: /api/events/13055/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill