← Mana Pro AMB Regional Championship Singapore

Water AlliesTier 1

at Mana Pro AMB Regional Championship Singapore

decks
7 (4.7% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
43 21-16-6
overall winrate
55.8%
ELO-adjusted winrate
53.1% avg ELO +1.1 per match
expected value
52.9% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
51.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1307 · median 1271 · range 1087–1556 (7 pilots with an ELO rating)
905 Q1 1184 Q3 1371 1633
29% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 29% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Ravishing Mill 14.0% 7 4-1-2 71.4% 63.6% 59.0% +4.5
Water Penguin Mill 13.3% 8 2-4-2 37.5% 41.7% 47.9% -1.0
Slimes 11.3% 5 2-3-0 40.0% 44.4% 41.6% -4.9
Wind Razorgale 11.3% 5 2-3-0 40.0% 44.4% 41.0% -5.2
Fire Crux Mage 8.7% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 68.6% +13.9
Wind Astra Cleric 8.7% 6 2-3-1 41.7% 45.0% 44.3% -3.0
Fire Exia 6.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.6% +4.2
Wind Allies 6.0% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 52.2% +1.6
Wind Shadowstrike 4.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 62.5% +19.9
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.0% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 47.6% -3.9
Fire Slimes 1.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 62.1% +19.3
Water Astra Cleric 1.3% 0
Water Luxem Assassin 1.3% 0
Water Tera Mage 1.3% 0
Fire Arcane 0.7% 0
Fire Ravishing Mill 0.7% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.4% +15.0
Water Arisanna 0.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 43.9% -9.8
Water Diana 0.7% 0
Water Umbra Ranger 0.7% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 0.7% 0
Wind Silvie 0.7% 0
Wind Slimes 0.7% 0
Decklists · 7 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 24 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 24 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Orb of Sealing +1.00 1 0 0
Esteemed Knight +1.00 1 0 0
Frostbind -1.00 0 1 0
Trained Sharpshooter +1.00 1 0 0
Frozen Dismissal +1.00 1 0 0
Snow Fairy -1.00 0 1 0
Sable Remnant -1.00 0 1 0
Mystic Purifier +1.00 1 0 0
Nia, Mistveiled Scout -1.00 0 1 0
Tristan, Underhanded -1.00 0 1 0
Mercenary's Blade -1.00 0 1 0
Sword of Seeking +1.00 1 0 0
Smoke Bombs -1.00 0 1 0
Song of Nurturing +1.00 1 0 0
Inspiring Call +1.00 1 0 0
Scavenging Raccoon +1.00 1 0 0
Freezing Hail -1.00 0 1 0
Ornamental Greatsword +1.00 1 0 0
Lorraine, Blademaster +1.00 1 0 0
Incapacitate -1.00 0 1 0
Tariff Ring -1.00 0 1 0
Lorraine, Wandering Warrior +1.00 1 0 0
Inundating Clash +1.00 1 0 0
Poisoned Dagger -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/13566/archetypes/Water Allies