← Mana Pro AMB Regional Championship Singapore

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at Mana Pro AMB Regional Championship Singapore

decks
21 (14.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
120 59-42-19
overall winrate
57.1%
ELO-adjusted winrate
53.4% avg ELO +1.1 per match
expected value
55.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
52.6% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1316 · median 1317 · range 1068–1535 (21 pilots with an ELO rating)
905 Q1 1184 Q3 1371 1633
38% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 14% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Penguin Mill 13.3% 29 17-8-4 65.5% 63.6% 58.8% +3.2
Slimes 11.3% 15 6-6-3 50.0% 50.0% 45.1% -2.0
Wind Razorgale 11.3% 20 10-7-3 57.5% 56.2% 53.2% +1.2
Fire Crux Mage 8.7% 11 4-5-2 45.5% 46.7% 44.0% -2.6
Wind Astra Cleric 8.7% 6 3-1-2 66.7% 60.0% 57.6% +4.0
Fire Exia 6.0% 8 7-1-0 87.5% 75.0% 68.0% +8.6
Wind Allies 6.0% 6 4-2-0 66.7% 60.0% 56.0% +3.2
Water Allies 4.7% 7 1-4-2 28.6% 36.4% 41.0% -4.5
Wind Shadowstrike 4.0% 6 2-3-1 41.7% 45.0% 44.6% -2.9
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.0% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 45.5% -3.4
Fire Slimes 1.3% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 52.3% +1.7
Water Astra Cleric 1.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.6% +13.8
Water Luxem Assassin 1.3% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 68.6% +17.9
Water Tera Mage 1.3% 0
Fire Arcane 0.7% 0
Fire Ravishing Mill 0.7% 0
Water Arisanna 0.7% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 39.7% -9.9
Water Diana 0.7% 0
Water Umbra Ranger 0.7% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 0.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.7% -11.7
Wind Silvie 0.7% 0
Wind Slimes 0.7% 0
Decklists · 21 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 11 mirror matches (2 draws excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down).

Winners more often ran: Glacial Evocation, Spirit of Serene Water, Primordial Ritual. Losers more often ran: Song of Frost, Diffusive Block, Freezing Steel.

Played more by winners
Glacial Evocation
Winning decks ran 1.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.7.
Of 11 mirrors: the winner ran more in 7, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Spirit of Serene Water
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 11 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 6.
Primordial Ritual
Winning decks ran 3.6 copies on average, losing decks 2.7.
Of 11 mirrors: the winner ran more in 6, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 3.
Viridian Protective Trinket
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 0.8.
Of 11 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 5.
Rippleback Terrapin
Winning decks ran 3.4 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 11 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 5.
Seaside Ringleader
Winning decks ran 3.1 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 11 mirrors: the winner ran more in 6, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 3.
Played more by losers
Song of Frost
Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 1.2.
Of 11 mirrors: the loser ran more in 5, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 6.
Diffusive Block
Losing decks ran 0.9 copies on average, winning decks 0.1.
Of 11 mirrors: the loser ran more in 5, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 6.
Freezing Steel
Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 11 mirrors: the loser ran more in 7, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 2.
Frostbind
Losing decks ran 2.5 copies on average, winning decks 1.9.
Of 11 mirrors: the loser ran more in 6, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 3.
Hailstorm Guard
Losing decks ran 0.7 copies on average, winning decks 0.4.
Of 11 mirrors: the loser ran more in 5, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 5.
Nico, Rapture's Embrace
Losing decks ran 0.4 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 11 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 7.
Show all 41 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 21 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Glacial Evocation +0.55 7 1 3
Song of Frost -0.45 0 5 6
Diffusive Block -0.45 0 5 0
Spirit of Serene Water +0.45 5 0 6
Freezing Steel -0.45 2 7 0
Primordial Ritual +0.36 6 2 3
Frostbind -0.36 2 6 3
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.36 5 1 5
Rippleback Terrapin +0.36 5 1 5
Hailstorm Guard -0.36 1 5 3
Nico, Rapture's Embrace -0.36 0 4 0
Strategem of Myriad Ice -0.36 0 4 0
Seaside Ringleader +0.36 6 2 3
Safeguard Amulet -0.36 0 4 0
Crimson Protective Trinket -0.36 0 4 0
Silvie, Wilds Whisperer +0.36 4 0 7
Snow Fairy -0.27 0 3 0
Mystic Purifier +0.27 4 1 6
Storm of Thorns -0.27 0 3 8
Tidal Lock +0.27 6 3 2
Frozen Dismissal +0.18 3 1 7
Vaporjet Shield -0.18 1 3 0
Cerulean Decree -0.18 1 3 7
Ravishing Finale -0.18 3 5 3
Water Resonance Bauble +0.18 3 1 0
Temptation's Facade -0.09 0 1 10
Nullifying Lantern +0.09 1 0 10
Spirit of Water +0.09 1 0 10
Quicksilver Grail -0.09 0 1 10
Tidestone Bovine +0.09 1 0 10
Vaporjet Shieldbearer -0.09 0 1 0
Waverider Protector -0.09 0 1 0
Fractal of Intrusion -0.09 0 1 0
Freezing Hail -0.09 0 1 0
Tideholder Claymore -0.09 0 1 0
Swooping Talons -0.09 0 1 0
Grand Crusader's Ring +0.09 1 0 0
Glacial Guidance -0.09 0 1 0
Revitalizing Cleanse +0.00 1 1 9
Icebound Slam +0.00 1 1 9
Nia, Mistveiled Scout +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/13566/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill