← Aria's Cardshop Regionals

Fire SlimesTier 2

at Aria's Cardshop Regionals

decks
5 (15.6% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
22 8-14-0
overall winrate
36.4%
ELO-adjusted winrate
41.2% avg ELO -3.3 per match
expected value
45.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
46.9% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1235 · median 1216 · range 1094–1468 (5 pilots with an ELO rating)
1055 Q1 1231 Q3 1424 1584
20% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 60% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Astra Cleric 12.5% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 64.7% +14.1
Slimes 9.4% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 52.4% +1.8
Water Penguin Mill 9.4% 3 0-3-0 0.0% 28.6% 29.6% -15.2
Wind Allies 9.4% 4 0-4-0 0.0% 25.0% 29.2% -13.3
Wind Shadowstrike 9.4% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 41.8% -13.1
Fire Arcane 6.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.4% +10.2
Fire Crux Mage 6.2% 0
Fire Exia 6.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.3% -15.6
Water Ravishing Mill 6.2% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 52.7% +2.0
Wind Razorgale 6.2% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 57.0% +5.2
Water Neos 3.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 42.7% -11.6
Decklists · 5 from this event

The 5 public Fire Slimes decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 19 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 19 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Unbroken Mustang +0.50 1 0 0
Blissful Calling -0.50 0 1 1
Forest Cake -0.50 0 1 1
Mystic Purifier -0.50 0 1 1
Slime King +0.50 1 0 0
Meltdown +0.50 1 0 0
Kind Beastcaller -0.50 0 1 1
Spellshield: Tera +0.50 1 0 0
Scavenging Raccoon -0.50 0 1 1
Red Slime -0.50 0 1 1
Escape the Wreckage +0.50 1 0 1
Twilight Slime +0.50 1 0 0
Heavenly Guide -0.50 0 1 0
Xiao Qiao, Cinderkeeper -0.50 0 1 0
Nullifying Lantern +0.00 1 1 0
Hymn of Gaia's Grace +0.00 1 1 0
Gaia's Songbird +0.00 1 1 0
Turbo Charge +0.00 1 1 0
Verdant Slime +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/14670/archetypes/Fire Slimes