← Card Merchant Christchurch Regional

SlimesTier 2

at Card Merchant Christchurch Regional

decks
10 (21.7% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
43 17-24-2
overall winrate
41.9%
ELO-adjusted winrate
42.9% avg ELO -2.5 per match
expected value
45.9% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
46.5% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1223 · median 1188 · range 1033–1427 (10 pilots with an ELO rating)
973 Q1 1153 Q3 1364 1558
10% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 30% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Shadowstrike 15.2% 8 2-5-1 31.2% 37.5% 43.3% -3.2
Fire Crux Mage 8.7% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 48.8% -1.1
Fire Umbra Ranger 6.5% 9 5-4-0 55.6% 53.8% 49.5% -0.2
Water Ravishing Mill 6.5% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 57.3% +11.7
Wind Allies 6.5% 5 0-4-1 10.0% 27.8% 30.3% -11.3
Fire Aggro 4.3% 5 2-3-0 40.0% 44.4% 44.9% -3.0
Fire Arcane 4.3% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 62.8% +12.3
Fire Crux Hybrid 4.3% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 34.3% -15.1
Fire Crux Lorraine 2.2% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 2.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 63.4% +21.4
Fire Slimes 2.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 41.6% -13.4
Water Crux Lorraine 2.2% 0
Water Tera Silvie 2.2% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 52.7% +2.0
Wind Crux Lorraine 2.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.9% -16.1
Wind Luxem Assassin 2.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 43.6% -10.2
Wind Neos 2.2% 0
Wind Slimes 2.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.5% -5.5
Wind Umbra Diana 2.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.2% +6.6
Decklists · 10 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 6 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 6 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Hymn of Gaia's Grace, Ordinary Bear, Stonescale Band. Losers more often ran: Slime's Blessing, Reprogram, Twilight Slime.

Played more by winners
Hymn of Gaia's Grace
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Ordinary Bear
Winning decks ran 2.5 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Stonescale Band
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Tera Sight
Winning decks ran 0.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Gaia's Songbird
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Vampiric Slime
Winning decks ran 1.3 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 1.
Played more by losers
Slime's Blessing
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 1.0.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Reprogram
Losing decks ran 2.8 copies on average, winning decks 1.7.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Twilight Slime
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 1.0.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Beastbond Ears
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Tithe Proclamation
Losing decks ran 0.3 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Lustrous Slime
Losing decks ran 2.3 copies on average, winning decks 2.0.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Show all 45 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 25 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Hymn of Gaia's Grace +0.67 5 1 0
Ordinary Bear +0.50 4 1 1
Slime's Blessing -0.50 0 3 2
Reprogram -0.50 1 4 1
Stonescale Band +0.50 3 0 3
Twilight Slime -0.50 0 3 3
Beastbond Ears -0.50 0 3 3
Grand Crusader's Ring -0.33 0 2 0
Gather Slimes +0.33 2 0 4
Slime Totem -0.33 0 2 0
Tera Sight +0.33 3 1 0
Quicksilver Grail +0.33 2 0 4
Verdant Scepter +0.33 2 0 4
Tariff Ring -0.33 0 2 0
Meadowbloom Dryad +0.33 2 0 0
Gaia's Songbird +0.33 3 1 0
Horn of Beastcalling +0.17 1 0 5
Vampiric Slime +0.17 3 2 0
Tithe Proclamation -0.17 1 2 0
Lustrous Slime -0.17 1 2 3
Baby Blue Slime +0.17 2 1 1
Bestial Frenzy -0.17 2 3 0
Slime Eruption -0.17 2 3 1
Red Slime -0.17 1 2 0
Baby Green Slime -0.17 0 1 5
Verdant Slime -0.17 1 2 1
Fire Resonance Bauble -0.17 0 1 0
Engineered Slime -0.17 1 2 1
Green Slime -0.17 0 1 0
Nia, Mistveiled Scout -0.17 0 1 0
Scry the Skies -0.17 0 1 0
Manic Zealot -0.17 0 1 0
Bauble of Mending -0.17 0 1 0
Academy Attendant -0.17 0 1 0
Rousing Slam -0.17 0 1 0
Crimson Protective Trinket -0.17 0 1 0
Blissful Calling +0.00 2 2 2
Slime King +0.00 2 2 2
Slimeshield +0.00 1 1 4
Beastbond Boots +0.00 1 1 4
Nullifying Lantern +0.00 2 2 1
Turbo Charge +0.00 1 1 2
Escape the Wreckage +0.00 1 1 4
Resolute Stand +0.00 1 1 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/5719/archetypes/Slimes