← 台灣 中部地區 Regional

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at 台灣 中部地區 Regional

decks
6 (7.9% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
34 17-10-7
overall winrate
60.3%
ELO-adjusted winrate
54.6% avg ELO +1.7 per match
expected value
56.1% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
54.0% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1386 · median 1372 · range 1319–1533 (6 pilots with an ELO rating)
1097 Q1 1252 Q3 1418 1694
17% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 15.8% 8 4-1-3 68.8% 62.5% 58.3% +4.0
Fire Luxem Assassin 11.8% 5 3-2-0 60.0% 55.6% 58.6% +5.0
Wind Shadowstrike 7.9% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 57.6% +7.3
Fire Aggro 6.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.6% +7.3
Water Astra Cleric 6.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.6% +7.3
Fire Lorraine 5.3% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 50.4% +0.3
Wind Allies 5.3% 4 2-0-2 75.0% 62.5% 61.7% +7.5
Fire Crux Mage 3.9% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 29.1% -20.0
Fire Erupting 3.9% 0
Water Allies 3.9% 3 0-2-1 16.7% 35.7% 35.6% -10.7
Wind Umbra Ranger 3.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.8% +6.1
Fire Arcane 2.6% 0
Fire Crux Hybrid 2.6% 0
Water Neos 2.6% 0
Fire Astra Cleric 1.3% 0
Water Crux Lorraine 1.3% 0
Wind Beast 1.3% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 34.9% -14.5
Wind Luxem Assassin 1.3% 0
Wind Silvie 1.3% 0
Wind Slice & Dice 1.3% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 59.5% +9.2
Wind Slimes 1.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 60.2% +16.4
Wind Tera Silvie 1.3% 0
Decklists · 6 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 3 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 3 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Fractal of Intrusion. Losers more often ran: Frostbind.

Played more by winners
Fractal of Intrusion
Winning decks ran 2.7 copies on average, losing decks 0.7.
Of 3 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 0.
Played more by losers
Frostbind
Losing decks ran 3.7 copies on average, winning decks 3.3.
Of 3 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Show all 26 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 24 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Fractal of Intrusion +1.00 3 0 0
Song of Frost -0.67 0 2 1
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.67 2 0 1
Snow Fairy -0.67 0 2 1
Tidal Sweep -0.67 0 2 1
Reprogram +0.67 2 0 0
Cell Sharpshooter +0.67 2 0 0
Lunete, Frostbinder Priest +0.67 2 0 0
Seasprite Diver -0.67 0 2 0
Frostbind -0.33 1 2 0
Revitalizing Cleanse -0.33 0 1 2
Cerulean Decree -0.33 0 1 2
Tariff Ring +0.33 1 0 0
Tithe Proclamation -0.33 0 1 0
Idle Thoughts -0.33 0 1 0
Safeguard Amulet -0.33 0 1 1
Stillwater Patrol -0.33 0 1 0
Freezing Hail -0.33 0 1 0
Diffusive Block +0.00 1 1 1
Vaporjet Shieldbearer +0.00 1 1 1
Torrential Blast +0.00 1 1 0
Spirit of Water +0.00 1 1 0
Savage Smash +0.00 1 1 0
Blinding Orb +0.00 1 1 1
Relentless Hexchaser +0.00 1 1 0
Crimson Protective Trinket +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/7840/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill