← AMB Texas Regional

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at AMB Texas Regional

decks
3 (6.1% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
16 9-5-2
overall winrate
62.5%
ELO-adjusted winrate
59.8% avg ELO +3.9 per match
expected value
52.9% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
53.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↓ low
mean ELO 1244 · median 1244 · range 1142–1345 (3 pilots with an ELO rating)
1046 Q1 1191 Q3 1381 1607
0% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 33% in the bottom. This deck is favored by lower-rated players — its raw winrate may understate how good it is.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 12.2% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 49.7% -0.3
Water Penguin Mill 12.2% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 58.8% +8.4
Wind Razorgale 8.2% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 36.5% -12.9
Fire Aggro 6.1% 0
Fire Exia 6.1% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.4% +0.7
Fire Slimes 6.1% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 67.4% +13.0
Wind Allies 6.1% 0
Wind Shadowstrike 6.1% 0
Fire Arcane 4.1% 0
Fire Crux Mage 4.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.5% +13.6
Water Allies 4.1% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 52.5% +2.4
Water Crux Lorraine 4.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.0% +17.5
Fire Astra Cleric 2.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.4% -17.0
Fire Crux Merlin 2.0% 0
Fire Ravishing Mill 2.0% 0
Fire Tera Mage 2.0% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 2.0% 0
Water Slimes 2.0% 0
Wind Slice & Dice 2.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.4% +13.4
Decklists · 3 from this event

The 3 public Water Ravishing Mill decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 27 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 27 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Song of Frost -1.00 0 1 0
Fractal of Polar Depths -1.00 0 1 0
Frostbind -1.00 0 1 0
Primordial Ritual -1.00 0 1 0
Diffusive Block +1.00 1 0 0
Revitalizing Cleanse +1.00 1 0 0
Frozen Dismissal -1.00 0 1 0
Rippleback Terrapin -1.00 0 1 0
Freezing Steel +1.00 1 0 0
Mystic Purifier +1.00 1 0 0
Grand Crusader's Ring +1.00 1 0 0
Nico, Rapture's Embrace +1.00 1 0 0
Glacial Evocation +1.00 1 0 0
Strategem of Myriad Ice -1.00 0 1 0
Tidal Sweep +1.00 1 0 0
Nullifying Lantern -1.00 0 1 0
Vaporjet Shield -1.00 0 1 0
Spirit of Water -1.00 0 1 0
Seaside Ringleader -1.00 0 1 0
Blinding Orb +1.00 1 0 0
Ravishing Finale +1.00 1 0 0
Safeguard Amulet +1.00 1 0 0
Tideholder Claymore +1.00 1 0 0
Quicksilver Grail -1.00 0 1 0
Tariff Ring -1.00 0 1 0
Tidal Lock +1.00 1 0 0
Silvie, Wilds Whisperer -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/14716/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill