← CakeTCG Online Regional

Fire Luxem AssassinTier 1

at CakeTCG Online Regional

decks
12 (11.8% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
89 44-33-12
overall winrate
56.2%
ELO-adjusted winrate
54.3% avg ELO +1.4 per match
expected value
56.3% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
54.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1370 · median 1375 · range 1206–1511 (12 pilots with an ELO rating)
976 Q1 1269 Q3 1443 1685
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 25% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Fire Rile 51.0% 27 15-9-3 61.1% 59.7% 56.6% +2.4
Fire Crux Mage 7.8% 6 4-2-0 66.7% 60.0% 53.9% +2.1
Fire Suzaku 7.8% 6 5-0-1 91.7% 75.0% 63.0% +6.9
Wind Shadowstrike 7.8% 7 4-1-2 71.4% 63.6% 55.9% +3.0
Fire Aggro 4.9% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 54.7% +3.5
Fire Suited 4.9% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 41.1% -8.6
Wind Allies 4.9% 4 2-1-1 62.5% 56.2% 54.1% +2.6
Fire Crux Lorraine 3.9% 4 2-2-0 50.0% 50.0% 48.1% -1.2
Fire Firebloom Burn 3.9% 4 1-2-1 37.5% 43.8% 46.7% -2.1
Fire Oblation 3.9% 3 2-0-1 83.3% 64.3% 61.0% +8.2
Horse and Taxes 3.9% 4 0-4-0 0.0% 25.0% 42.0% -5.1
Wind Wakeup Combo 3.9% 5 2-1-2 60.0% 55.6% 52.9% +1.7
Water Fractal 2.9% 4 1-2-1 37.5% 43.8% 44.4% -3.6
Fire Slimes 2.0% 0
Fire Umbra Guardian 2.0% 0
Water Aetherwing 2.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.9% -4.9
Wind Crux Mage 2.0% 0
Wind Seiryuu 2.0% 4 0-4-0 0.0% 25.0% 41.5% -5.4
Fire Aetherwing 1.0% 0
Fire Exia 1.0% 0
Fire Ravishing Mill 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.3% +8.5
Water Allies 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.0% +9.6
Water Crux Mage 1.0% 0
Water Genbu 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.8% +7.7
Water Ravishing Mill 1.0% 0
Water Umbra Guardian 1.0% 0
Wind Ciel 1.0% 0
Wind Exia 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 52.1% +3.4
Wind Lorraine 1.0% 0
Wind Razorgale 1.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 47.5% -3.9
Decklists · 12 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 4 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 4 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Regal Inquisition, Blanche, Sheltering Saint, Vanish from Sight. Losers more often ran: Thieving Cut, Nullifying Mirror, Evercurrent Raider.

Played more by winners
Regal Inquisition
Winning decks ran 2.2 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Blanche, Sheltering Saint
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Vanish from Sight
Winning decks ran 2.5 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Heavenly Guide
Winning decks ran 1.2 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Striking Illuminance
Winning decks ran 1.5 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Turbo Charge
Winning decks ran 0.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Played more by losers
Thieving Cut
Losing decks ran 3.5 copies on average, winning decks 2.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Nullifying Mirror
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Evercurrent Raider
Losing decks ran 3.5 copies on average, winning decks 1.8.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Scry the Skies
Losing decks ran 1.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.8.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 29 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 18 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Thieving Cut -0.75 0 3 1
Nullifying Mirror -0.75 0 3 1
Regal Inquisition +0.75 3 0 1
Resolute Stand -0.50 0 2 2
Reduce to Ash -0.50 0 2 2
Excalibur, Cleansing Light +0.50 2 0 2
Blanche, Sheltering Saint +0.50 3 1 0
Vanish from Sight +0.50 3 1 0
Nullifying Lantern -0.50 0 2 2
Evercurrent Raider -0.50 1 3 0
Blinding Orb -0.50 0 2 0
Portentous Tanggu +0.50 2 0 2
Unbroken Mustang +0.50 2 0 0
Staggering Strike +0.50 2 0 0
Sovereign Sanctuary +0.50 2 0 0
Fast Cure +0.50 2 0 0
Varuckan Acolyte +0.50 2 0 0
Insignia of the Corhazi +0.25 1 0 3
Orb of Hubris +0.25 1 0 0
Heavenly Guide +0.25 2 1 0
Striking Illuminance +0.25 2 1 1
Turbo Charge +0.25 2 1 1
Scry the Skies -0.25 1 2 0
Fiery Interference -0.25 0 1 0
Morgan, Soul Guide -0.25 0 1 0
Sadi, Blood Harvester -0.25 0 1 0
Uncover the Plot +0.00 2 2 0
Crystallized Destiny +0.00 1 1 2
Juggle Knives +0.00 1 1 2

JSON: /api/events/32040/archetypes/Fire Luxem Assassin