← Illusive Online Webcam Regionals

SlimesTier 1

at Illusive Online Webcam Regionals

decks
13 (13.1% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
68 32-24-12
overall winrate
55.9%
ELO-adjusted winrate
53.3% avg ELO +1.1 per match
expected value
53.8% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
52.3% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1390 · median 1362 · range 1149–1652 (13 pilots with an ELO rating)
972 Q1 1233 Q3 1413 1689
38% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 23% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Wind Allies 15.2% 12 4-7-1 37.5% 40.6% 46.6% -1.5
Wind Shadowstrike 12.1% 8 5-1-2 75.0% 66.7% 57.7% +3.7
Fire Crux Hybrid 10.1% 8 4-3-1 56.2% 54.2% 52.4% +1.1
Fire Crux Mage 9.1% 6 3-2-1 58.3% 55.0% 53.7% +2.0
Water Allies 6.1% 5 4-0-1 90.0% 72.2% 57.5% +4.3
Water Ravishing Mill 6.1% 6 3-1-2 66.7% 60.0% 57.6% +4.0
Fire Aggro 5.1% 5 2-3-0 40.0% 44.4% 47.1% -1.7
Fire Slimes 5.1% 2 0-0-2 50.0% 50.0% 52.3% +2.2
Fire Luxem Assassin 3.0% 0
Wind Slimes 3.0% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 51.7% +1.7
Wind Umbra Tristan 2.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 44.7% -8.5
Fire Arcane 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.5% +7.2
Fire Crux Lorraine 1.0% 4 0-4-0 0.0% 25.0% 37.3% -8.1
Fire Crux Merlin 1.0% 0
Fire Neos 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.6% +7.3
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.0% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 55.2% +5.0
Water Beast 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.0% +6.4
Water Crux Lorraine 1.0% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 56.8% +6.5
Wind Crux Lorraine 1.0% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 51.4% +2.2
Wind Diana 1.0% 0
Wind Umbra Diana 1.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 45.6% -7.1
Decklists · 13 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 4 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 4 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Slime King, Nullifying Lantern, Slime's Blessing. Losers more often ran: Hymn of Gaia's Grace, Blissful Calling, Gaia's Songbird.

Played more by winners
Slime King
Winning decks ran 1.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 0.
Nullifying Lantern
Winning decks ran 0.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Slime's Blessing
Winning decks ran 2.2 copies on average, losing decks 1.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Baby Green Slime Banned
Baby Green Slime
Winning decks ran 3.8 copies on average, losing decks 3.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Verdant Slime
Winning decks ran 1.0 copy on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Played more by losers
Hymn of Gaia's Grace
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 0.
Blissful Calling
Losing decks ran 2.8 copies on average, winning decks 2.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Gaia's Songbird
Losing decks ran 1.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Resolute Stand
Losing decks ran 2.8 copies on average, winning decks 1.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Beastbond Boots
Losing decks ran 0.8 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Bestial Frenzy
Losing decks ran 2.0 copies on average, winning decks 1.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 32 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 20 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Slime King +1.00 4 0 0
Hymn of Gaia's Grace -1.00 0 4 0
Blissful Calling -0.75 0 3 1
Nullifying Lantern +0.75 3 0 0
Gaia's Songbird -0.75 0 3 0
Engineered Slime -0.50 0 2 2
Reprogram +0.50 2 0 2
Crimson Protective Trinket +0.50 2 0 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.50 2 0 0
Tithe Proclamation -0.50 0 2 0
Resolute Stand -0.25 1 2 1
Horn of Beastcalling -0.25 0 1 3
Slimeshield +0.25 1 0 3
Beastbond Boots -0.25 1 2 1
Gather Slimes -0.25 0 1 3
Slime's Blessing +0.25 2 1 1
Baby Blue Slime +0.25 1 0 3
Meadowbloom Dryad -0.25 0 1 0
Stalwart Shieldmate -0.25 0 1 0
Bestial Frenzy -0.25 1 2 1
Turbo Charge +0.25 1 0 3
Verdant Scepter -0.25 0 1 3
Baby Green Slime +0.25 2 1 1
Twilight Slime -0.25 1 2 1
Beastbond Ears -0.25 0 1 3
Safeguard Amulet +0.25 1 0 0
Verdant Slime +0.25 2 1 0
Scavenging Raccoon +0.25 1 0 0
Beastbond Paws +0.25 1 0 0
Tariff Ring +0.25 1 0 0
Lustrous Slime +0.00 1 1 2
Green Slime +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/5967/archetypes/Slimes