← Curio Grand Archive Mercurial Heart Regionals

Water Ravishing MillTier 2

at Curio Grand Archive Mercurial Heart Regionals

decks
4 (7.5% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
23 7-11-5
overall winrate
41.3%
ELO-adjusted winrate
39.7% avg ELO -3.9 per match
expected value
45.5% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
44.3% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1268 · median 1249 · range 1231–1343 (4 pilots with an ELO rating)
1006 Q1 1182 Q3 1340 1656
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 15.1% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 44.9% -3.8
Fire Aggro 11.3% 5 2-2-1 50.0% 50.0% 52.1% +1.2
Wind Shadowstrike 11.3% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 32.6% -16.7
Fire Crux Hybrid 7.5% 2 0-2-0 0.0% 33.3% 34.2% -15.2
Wind Allies 7.5% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.6% -16.6
Fire Erupting 3.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.0% +12.9
Fire Luxem Assassin 3.8% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 46.3% -3.6
Fire Slimes 3.8% 0
Wind Diana 3.8% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.4% +18.2
Wind Umbra Ranger 3.8% 0
Fire Crux Mage 1.9% 0
Fire Crux Merlin 1.9% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.9% +14.2
Fire Neos 1.9% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% -1.3
Fire Ravishing Mill 1.9% 0
Water Crux Merlin 1.9% 0
Water Lorraine 1.9% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 47.9% -3.4
Water Luxem Assassin 1.9% 0
Water Neos 1.9% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 40.4% -9.2
Wind Arcane 1.9% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 38.5% -18.5
Wind Luxem Assassin 1.9% 0
Wind Overlord 1.9% 0
Wind Slimes 1.9% 0
Decklists · 4 from this event

The 4 public Water Ravishing Mill decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 8 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 8 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Song of Frost +1.00 1 0 0
Frostbind +1.00 1 0 0
Waverider Protector +1.00 1 0 0
Snow Fairy -1.00 0 1 0
Hailstorm Guard -1.00 0 1 0
Tidal Sweep -1.00 0 1 0
Cerulean Decree +1.00 1 0 0
Cell Sharpshooter -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/6235/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill