SlimesTier 1

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

The 21 public Slimes decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

• DVD 87 cards · placed #3
• EvilDarK 85 cards · placed #4
• Mushroom 81 cards · placed #10
• CTSrex 83 cards · placed #14
• Dennisyao 85 cards · placed #19
• WaynesSoSad 87 cards · placed #21
• Lazybone 89 cards · placed #26
• Niokax 81 cards · placed #30
• Bujyu 86 cards · placed #31
• Yudi 83 cards · placed #33
• Jhin 83 cards · placed #41
• AdamNg 77 cards · placed #42
• Hibiki 83 cards · placed #44
• RICHARD092 83 cards · placed #47
• STvC 79 cards · placed #52
• AsakaSea 85 cards · placed #54
• walay1223 81 cards · placed #55
• why3127 79 cards · placed #62
• Bilet 83 cards · placed #66
• otko 81 cards · placed #67
• Yoh 81 cards · placed #77

In 19 mirror matches (2 draws excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 4 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down).

Winners more often ran: Slime King, Bestial Frenzy, Blanche, Sheltering Saint. Losers more often ran: Slime Eruption, Tariff Ring, Red Slime.

↑ Played more by winners

Slime King

Winning decks ran 2.2 copies on average, losing decks 1.6.

Of 19 mirrors: the winner ran more in 10, the loser ran more in 3, both ran the same in 6.

Bestial Frenzy

Winning decks ran 2.1 copies on average, losing decks 1.6.

Of 19 mirrors: the winner ran more in 9, the loser ran more in 3, both ran the same in 7.

Blanche, Sheltering Saint

Winning decks ran 0.6 copies on average, losing decks 0.0.

Of 19 mirrors: the winner ran more in 6, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 13.

Vampiric Slime

Winning decks ran 2.3 copies on average, losing decks 1.9.

Of 19 mirrors: the winner ran more in 9, the loser ran more in 4, both ran the same in 6.

Resolute Stand

Winning decks ran 1.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.8.

Of 19 mirrors: the winner ran more in 7, the loser ran more in 2, both ran the same in 10.

Dungeon Guide

Winning decks ran 3.8 copies on average, losing decks 2.9.

Of 19 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 15.

↓ Played more by losers

Slime Eruption

Losing decks ran 3.0 copies on average, winning decks 2.6.

Of 19 mirrors: the loser ran more in 9, the winner ran more in 3, both ran the same in 7.

Tariff Ring

Losing decks ran 0.4 copies on average, winning decks 0.1.

Of 19 mirrors: the loser ran more in 7, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 10.

Red Slime

Losing decks ran 0.6 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.

Of 19 mirrors: the loser ran more in 4, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 15.

Green Slime

Losing decks ran 2.9 copies on average, winning decks 2.6.

Of 19 mirrors: the loser ran more in 8, the winner ran more in 5, both ran the same in 6.

Reprogram

Losing decks ran 1.8 copies on average, winning decks 1.4.

Of 19 mirrors: the loser ran more in 8, the winner ran more in 5, both ran the same in 6.

Tithe Proclamation

Losing decks ran 0.3 copies on average, winning decks 0.2.

Of 19 mirrors: the loser ran more in 5, the winner ran more in 2, both ran the same in 12.