← Mortal Ambition - Indonesia Regional

SlimesTier 2

at Mortal Ambition - Indonesia Regional

decks
11 (11.8% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
49 19-24-6
overall winrate
44.9%
ELO-adjusted winrate
50.7% avg ELO +0.2 per match
expected value
46.2% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
49.1% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1246 · median 1225 · range 1146–1442 (11 pilots with an ELO rating)
1058 Q1 1175 Q3 1399 1685
18% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 36% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Penguin Mill 14.0% 11 3-6-2 36.4% 40.0% 45.6% -1.9
Water Ravishing Mill 7.5% 5 0-2-3 30.0% 38.9% 46.7% -1.9
Wind Astra Cleric 7.5% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.1% -6.3
Wind Allies 6.5% 5 3-2-0 60.0% 55.6% 60.7% +6.2
Water Tera Kongming 5.4% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 59.0% +8.6
Wind Shadowstrike 5.4% 6 0-6-0 0.0% 20.0% 24.7% -13.5
Fire Exia 4.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.0% +4.8
Water Allies 4.3% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 42.4% -5.7
Fire Aggro 3.2% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 49.8% -0.2
Fire Crux Mage 3.2% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 55.2% +3.9
Fire Slimes 3.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 40.9% -14.6
Water Tera Mage 3.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.9% +14.2
Fire Arcane 2.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 62.8% +20.5
Water Crux Mage 2.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 44.1% -9.4
Water Luxem Assassin 2.2% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 54.8% +4.6
Fire Arisanna 1.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 60.0% +16.0
Fire Kongming 1.1% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 1.1% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.0% +14.4
Water Arisanna 1.1% 0
Water Astra Cleric 1.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.3% +14.8
Water Kongming 1.1% 0
Water Wind Vanitas 1.1% 0
Wind Beast 1.1% 0
Wind Kongming 1.1% 0
Wind Neos 1.1% 0
Wind Razorgale 1.1% 0
Wind Silvie 1.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 60.9% +17.5
Decklists · 11 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 22 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 22 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Entrancing Filigree -1.00 0 1 0
Unbroken Mustang +1.00 1 0 0
Dungeon Guide -1.00 0 1 0
Blissful Calling -1.00 0 1 0
Mystic Purifier -1.00 0 1 0
Slimeshield +1.00 1 0 0
Slime King -1.00 0 1 0
Blanche, Sheltering Saint +1.00 1 0 0
Kind Beastcaller -1.00 0 1 0
Backup Charger +1.00 1 0 0
Baby Blue Slime +1.00 1 0 0
Scavenging Raccoon -1.00 0 1 0
Nascent Blast -1.00 0 1 0
Gaia's Songbird +1.00 1 0 0
Turbo Charge +1.00 1 0 0
Tera Sight +1.00 1 0 0
Reprogram +1.00 1 0 0
Slime Eruption +1.00 1 0 0
Morgan, Soul Guide -1.00 0 1 0
Verdant Slime -1.00 0 1 0
Nullifying Mirror +1.00 1 0 0
Twilight Slime -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/12996/archetypes/Slimes