← Mortal Ambition - Indonesia Regional

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at Mortal Ambition - Indonesia Regional

decks
7 (7.5% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
44 26-9-9
overall winrate
69.3%
ELO-adjusted winrate
59.9% avg ELO +3.5 per match
expected value
59.3% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
55.2% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1429 · median 1405 · range 1286–1590 (7 pilots with an ELO rating)
1058 Q1 1175 Q3 1399 1685
71% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 0% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Penguin Mill 14.0% 12 5-4-3 54.2% 53.1% 52.5% +1.1
Slimes 11.8% 5 2-0-3 70.0% 61.1% 53.3% +1.9
Wind Astra Cleric 7.5% 5 4-1-0 80.0% 66.7% 64.0% +8.1
Wind Allies 6.5% 5 3-2-0 60.0% 55.6% 49.5% -0.3
Water Tera Kongming 5.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 50.7% +1.1
Wind Shadowstrike 5.4% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 64.3% +13.8
Fire Exia 4.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.2% +9.9
Water Allies 4.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.8% +6.1
Fire Aggro 3.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.2% +13.1
Fire Crux Mage 3.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 56.3% +10.0
Fire Slimes 3.2% 0
Water Tera Mage 3.2% 0
Fire Arcane 2.2% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.5% +7.3
Water Crux Mage 2.2% 0
Water Luxem Assassin 2.2% 3 2-0-1 83.3% 64.3% 66.6% +12.4
Fire Arisanna 1.1% 0
Fire Kongming 1.1% 0
Fire Luxem Assassin 1.1% 0
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.1% 0
Water Arisanna 1.1% 0
Water Astra Cleric 1.1% 0
Water Kongming 1.1% 0
Water Wind Vanitas 1.1% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 44.8% -3.9
Wind Beast 1.1% 0
Wind Kongming 1.1% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 53.7% +3.6
Wind Neos 1.1% 0
Wind Razorgale 1.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.8% -16.3
Wind Silvie 1.1% 0
Decklists · 7 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches, here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 14 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 14 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Tidal Lock -1.00 0 2 0
Song of Frost +0.50 1 0 1
Primordial Ritual +0.50 1 0 1
Frostbind +0.50 1 0 1
Frozen Dismissal -0.50 0 1 1
Rippleback Terrapin +0.50 1 0 1
Mystic Purifier +0.50 1 0 0
Hailstorm Guard -0.50 0 1 0
Smoke Bombs +0.50 1 0 1
Ravishing Finale +0.50 1 0 1
Strategem of Myriad Ice -0.50 0 1 0
Wind Resonance Bauble -0.50 0 1 0
Safeguard Amulet -0.50 0 1 0
Snow Fairy +0.00 1 1 0

JSON: /api/events/12996/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill