← Illusive TCG Online Regionals

SlimesTier 2

at Illusive TCG Online Regionals

decks
12 (13.3% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
61 23-28-10
overall winrate
45.9%
ELO-adjusted winrate
50.4% avg ELO +0.1 per match
expected value
46.4% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
49.7% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1361 · median 1352 · range 1047–1617 (12 pilots with an ELO rating)
972 Q1 1284 Q3 1447 1702
25% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 17% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Penguin Mill 12.2% 7 2-4-1 35.7% 40.9% 50.0% -0.0
Water Ravishing Mill 10.0% 4 1-2-1 37.5% 43.8% 45.9% -2.6
Wind Allies 10.0% 9 2-5-2 33.3% 38.5% 44.4% -2.6
Wind Astra Cleric 8.9% 6 3-3-0 50.0% 50.0% 50.1% +0.0
Wind Razorgale 7.8% 7 2-3-2 42.9% 45.5% 50.7% +0.4
Fire Slimes 6.7% 4 1-3-0 25.0% 37.5% 48.7% -0.8
Wind Shadowstrike 6.7% 7 5-1-1 78.6% 68.2% 60.6% +5.3
Fire Aggro 5.6% 5 2-2-1 50.0% 50.0% 52.2% +1.3
Fire Crux Mage 3.3% 4 3-0-1 87.5% 68.8% 53.8% +2.4
Water Allies 3.3% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 47.7% -3.7
Water Diana 2.2% 0
Water Tera Kongming 2.2% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.3% -5.9
Wind Slimes 2.2% 0
Fire Exia 1.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 43.4% -10.6
Water Kongming 1.1% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 53.4% +3.2
Water Luxem Assassin 1.1% 0
Water Silvie 1.1% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.7% +7.5
Water Umbra Ranger 1.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 47.7% -3.7
Wind Crux Mage 1.1% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 49.3% -1.2
Decklists · 12 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 6 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 6 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Resolute Stand, Nullifying Lantern, Escape the Wreckage. Losers more often ran: Beastbond Ears, Slime King, Slimeshield.

Played more by winners
Resolute Stand
Winning decks ran 2.3 copies on average, losing decks 0.8.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 5, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 0.
Nullifying Lantern
Winning decks ran 0.8 copies on average, losing decks 0.3.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Escape the Wreckage
Winning decks ran 3.5 copies on average, losing decks 2.2.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 4, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Mystic Purifier
Winning decks ran 1.8 copies on average, losing decks 1.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Lustrous Slime
Winning decks ran 3.5 copies on average, losing decks 3.3.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Scavenging Raccoon
Winning decks ran 2.3 copies on average, losing decks 1.7.
Of 6 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Played more by losers
Beastbond Ears
Losing decks ran 0.5 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 3.
Slime King
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.3.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Slimeshield
Losing decks ran 3.8 copies on average, winning decks 3.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 2.
Slime's Blessing
Losing decks ran 1.7 copies on average, winning decks 1.7.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Nascent Blast
Losing decks ran 1.0 copy on average, winning decks 0.5.
Of 6 mirrors: the loser ran more in 2, the winner ran more in 1, both ran the same in 3.
Show all 40 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 21 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Resolute Stand +0.67 5 1 0
Nullifying Lantern +0.50 4 1 1
Escape the Wreckage +0.50 4 1 1
Beastbond Ears -0.50 0 3 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +0.33 2 0 1
Dungeon Guide +0.33 2 0 4
Mystic Purifier +0.33 3 1 1
Slime King -0.33 1 3 0
Slimeshield -0.33 1 3 2
Backup Charger +0.33 2 0 4
Lustrous Slime +0.33 3 1 2
Scavenging Raccoon +0.33 3 1 2
Slime Eruption +0.33 3 1 2
Quicksilver Grail +0.33 2 0 4
Stonescale Band -0.33 0 2 4
Gaia's Blessing +0.33 2 0 4
Royal Bear -0.33 0 2 0
Grand Crusader's Ring -0.33 0 2 0
Slime Totem -0.33 0 2 0
Red Slime -0.33 0 2 0
Invigoration -0.33 0 2 0
Blissful Calling +0.17 2 1 3
Beastbond Boots -0.17 0 1 5
Slime's Blessing -0.17 1 2 2
Hymn of Gaia's Grace +0.17 1 0 1
Gaia's Songbird +0.17 2 1 3
Turbo Charge +0.17 2 1 1
Tariff Ring +0.17 2 1 0
Nascent Blast -0.17 1 2 0
Nullifying Mirror +0.17 2 1 1
Entrancing Filigree +0.17 1 0 0
Ordinary Bear -0.17 0 1 0
Heavenly Guide +0.17 1 0 0
Bestial Frenzy -0.17 0 1 0
Reprogram -0.17 0 1 0
Unbroken Mustang -0.17 0 1 0
Twilight Slime +0.17 1 0 0
Kind Beastcaller +0.00 1 1 0
Tera Sight +0.00 2 2 0
Verdant Slime +0.00 2 2 0

JSON: /api/events/14764/archetypes/Slimes