Wind RazorgaleTier 1

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

The 42 public Wind Razorgale decklists from this event, ordered by final placement — click a pilot for the full list.

• TeamTrueCaban 87 cards · placed #1
• TTA 85 cards · placed #3
• Surav 87 cards · placed #4
• Auli 85 cards · placed #5
• Matt 87 cards · placed #6
• Lifdrasyl 87 cards · placed #7
• cactus 87 cards · placed #8
• Noel 83 cards · placed #11
• OkaygeBusiness 83 cards · placed #13
• stevo7653 83 cards · placed #14
• TeamTrueTerry 85 cards · placed #15
• Brajamsut 83 cards · placed #16
• Sano 85 cards · placed #17
• TeamTrueIsaac 83 cards · placed #18
• Valkyrie 83 cards · placed #21
• Skysama 83 cards · placed #22
• Mordred 83 cards · placed #23
• likeBAILEY 87 cards · placed #24
• Ferrenthian 83 cards · placed #30
• Linus 83 cards · placed #31
• RexKanin 83 cards · placed #32
• Mutsuki 85 cards · placed #34
• Ver 83 cards · placed #35
• Shou 85 cards · placed #42
• Dobbert 85 cards · placed #46
• CCMrMullen 87 cards · placed #55
• TheRainGoddess 85 cards · placed #58
• UnsungCrown 83 cards · placed #59
• Biefall 87 cards · placed #61
• leoblade 83 cards · placed #81
• Yorkospektor 83 cards · placed #83
• FretTheCapo 85 cards · placed #92
• Sebastian 85 cards · placed #98
• Morri 85 cards · placed #103
• Cranky56 85 cards · placed #104
• Acidflaming 85 cards · placed #114
• 0xAn1ma 83 cards · placed #115
• Ceothas 89 cards · placed #139
• Syd7 87 cards · placed #153
• Pavonee 87 cards · placed #157
• KydlimePie 87 cards · placed #175
• Yakatori 84 cards · placed #191

In 75 mirror matches (14 draws excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 15 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down).

Winners more often ran: Scavenging Raccoon, Turbo Charge, Verdigris Decree. Losers more often ran: Cleansing Reunion, Dominating Strike, Viridian Protective Trinket.

↑ Played more by winners

Scavenging Raccoon

Winning decks ran 1.4 copies on average, losing decks 0.9.

Of 75 mirrors: the winner ran more in 37, the loser ran more in 16, both ran the same in 22.

Turbo Charge

Winning decks ran 1.4 copies on average, losing decks 1.0.

Of 75 mirrors: the winner ran more in 31, the loser ran more in 13, both ran the same in 31.

Verdigris Decree

Winning decks ran 2.6 copies on average, losing decks 2.3.

Of 75 mirrors: the winner ran more in 37, the loser ran more in 20, both ran the same in 18.

Escape the Wreckage

Winning decks ran 1.9 copies on average, losing decks 1.4.

Of 75 mirrors: the winner ran more in 34, the loser ran more in 19, both ran the same in 22.

Displace

Winning decks ran 0.7 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.

Of 75 mirrors: the winner ran more in 20, the loser ran more in 11, both ran the same in 44.

Slimeshield

Winning decks ran 2.3 copies on average, losing decks 1.9.

Of 75 mirrors: the winner ran more in 29, the loser ran more in 21, both ran the same in 25.

↓ Played more by losers

Cleansing Reunion

Losing decks ran 1.1 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.

Of 75 mirrors: the loser ran more in 23, the winner ran more in 9, both ran the same in 43.

Dominating Strike

Losing decks ran 2.2 copies on average, winning decks 1.9.

Of 75 mirrors: the loser ran more in 31, the winner ran more in 21, both ran the same in 23.

Viridian Protective Trinket

Losing decks ran 0.8 copies on average, winning decks 0.7.

Of 75 mirrors: the loser ran more in 18, the winner ran more in 10, both ran the same in 47.

Scout the Land

Losing decks ran 2.5 copies on average, winning decks 2.1.

Of 75 mirrors: the loser ran more in 29, the winner ran more in 22, both ran the same in 24.

Tariff Ring

Losing decks ran 0.6 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.

Of 75 mirrors: the loser ran more in 23, the winner ran more in 16, both ran the same in 36.

Enhance Hearing

Losing decks ran 0.9 copies on average, winning decks 0.5.

Of 75 mirrors: the loser ran more in 17, the winner ran more in 10, both ran the same in 48.